iFixit is calling this revolutionary, not Apple. Review the text of the article, please.All of a sudden, Apple found a revolutionary way to replace the battery. I wonder if the EU had something to do with this.
iFixit is calling this revolutionary, not Apple. Review the text of the article, please.All of a sudden, Apple found a revolutionary way to replace the battery. I wonder if the EU had something to do with this.
iFixit, a major critic of Apple’s repairability for years, seems to think otherwise. They even refer to it as “revolutionary”. That’s like Greenpeace saying Apple is doing a good job on the environment. It means something. Not on tech blogs, obviously.
Neither the 16 pro or 16 pro max will still be sold when these regulations come into force. The 16 likely will.And this new innovation is on the cheaper iPhones 16 and +
While 16 pro get a metal battery without this removal technology (which is fine)
But 16 pro max is short changed with NEITHER OF THE ABOVE changes.
Look at how tightly that's all packed...there would have to be spaces around the battery, which means moving things around, and probably increasing the size of the phone in some dimension (or decrease the size of the battery). Even if it's limited to two screws, it's still going to cause more trouble.Four screws on the corners of a battery is a time tested method to secure it.
But noooooo
If you have water inside your phone, you have much bigger problems than replacing the battery.There is still a question of how this will hold up over time, after a phone is cycled, gets wet, and so on
Ffs just use screws. It doesn’t need to be this complicated.
if they had, it would still be user replaceable without electronic devicesAll of a sudden, Apple found a revolutionary way to replace the battery. I wonder if the EU had something to do with this.
ffs just understand why screws make no sense, it doesn't need to be that complicated.Ffs just use screws. It doesn’t need to be this complicated.
I apologize if you thought I was accusing Apple of being altruistic. I'm not and wouldn't expect them to be. I think the regulations were likely the impetus for change; if Apple's own repair services also benefit, so be it.You realize that Apple's tech's need to remove the battery too, right? The harder it is to do, the more it costs Apple to fulfill the repair. Don't let iFixit's blathering convince you they're somehow steering the ship. Apple needs to streamline these processes for their own reasons and will continue to do so.
Exactly. If competition wasn't motivating a change, then it's likely people didn't really care about it. Regulating it just substitutes a bureaucrat's preferences for the consumer's preference.
I think the regulations were likely the impetus for change; if Apple's own repair services also benefit, so be it.
And how exactly are you going to attach screws to a battery pouch without additional plastic reinforcements on the sides? This seems like a much better use of space.Four screws on the corners of a battery is a time tested method to secure it.
But noooooo
iFixit's main goal is to sell their tools and their overpriced soldering iron.iFixit, a major critic of Apple’s repairability for years, seems to think otherwise. They even refer to it as “revolutionary”. That’s like Greenpeace saying Apple is doing a good job on the environment. It means something. Not on toxic tech blogs, obviously.
It's not possible to put screws directly through a lithium cell, so the only way would be to add a frame around the cell with screw mounts. The cell would then be attached to the frame with adhesive, which would make it kind of pointless because now there's adhesive involved again and the frame is just acting as a middleman. The addition of a frame would also increase the size of the battery and when you're designing the internal layout of something as compact as a smartphone, space is at a premium.Ffs just use screws. It doesn’t need to be this complicated.