Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
69,368
40,405


Happy iPhone 17 day! The iPhone Air and the other new iPhone 17 models are now available in stores and in the hands of customers. We picked up the iPhone Air, iPhone 17 Pro, and iPhone 17 Pro Max for a first impressions video.


Unsurprisingly, the iPhone Air is incredibly thin, and holding one after holding the much larger Pro models makes for a real "wow" moment. If the weight of the bigger iPhones bothers you, the Air will be a relief.

There's not too much to say about the Air other than fawning over its 5.6mm thin design. It does have the A19 Pro for performance on par with the Pro models, but it's limited to a single-lens rear camera. If you use the Ultra Wide or Telephoto lenses, you'll miss them. Apple did make some under-the-hood changes that allow the Air to support editable portrait mode photos with a single lens, and you do get the same 18-megapixel front-facing camera that the other models have.

iphone-17-pro-air.jpg

Moving on to the Pro models, the 17 Pro and Pro Max feel hefty this year compared to the Air. The 17 Pro is probably the size that most people will prefer because it's a good blend of pro features, display size, and weight.

Apple made interesting color choices this year, and the bright orange Pro color stands out. We got the Pro Max in the orange shade and the Pro in the silver, and the silver is surprisingly nice. It's one of the better light silver shades that Apple has come out with. There is no titanium this year, because Apple discovered that it wasn't great for dissipating heat. We're back to aluminum, and there's a whole new vapor chamber cooling system to maximize the thermal performance of the A19 Pro chip.

iphone-air-thickness.jpg

You won't see it, but the iPhone 17 Pro models have a little bit of water inside to direct heat away from the chip and through the aluminum casing. It's still early, but the iPhone 17 Pro models don't seem to have the immediate heat issues of the 16 Pro models when doing GPU-heavy tasks.

Apple updated the iPhone 17 Pro design, and instead of a camera bump, we have a whole camera plateau. It's big, but some people might appreciate the symmetry of the new design. There's also a two-tone sort of look because most of the frame is aluminum with just a rectangle at the back made from Ceramic Shield material for wireless charging. This is the first time that Apple has used Ceramic Shield for the back of the iPhone, and it's supposed to be more durable. Apple says the front cover is Ceramic Shield 2, which is more scratch resistant than before. There's an updated anti-reflective coating as well, but it's subtle.

Battery life on the iPhone Air is impressive for its size, but the Pro and Pro Max have bigger gains. Battery life is six hours longer per Apple's testing, though we'll need more time to see what that means in day-to-day usage.

The new front-facing camera has a feature that lets you take landscape or portrait selfie shots without rotating the phone, which is unique. You can also record with the front and rear-facing cameras at the same time if you want to do reaction-style videos.

iphone-17-line-size-display.jpg

The Pro models have a 48-megapixel Telephoto lens with 4x or 8x zoom, so you can zoom in further than before. It's useful to have another focal length, and it produces nice bokeh for portrait shots.

Make sure to stay tuned to MacRumors because we'll have more in-depth videos coming, including Camera comparisons and videos where we pit Apple's new iPhones against popular smartphones from Samsung and Google.

Article Link: iPhone 17 Lineup Hands On: Air's Thinness vs Pro's Power
 
I think Apple should’ve gone more extreme with the iPhone Air. I wish the display size had been smaller so it wouldn’t only be even lighter but also easier to cary. I wish they’d removed the USB-C port and made a portless phone (Apple can find a wireless solution for DFU mode). Right now the Air is lighter than the other phones, but not by much.

I loved the 2015 12” MacBook, and I think it was a more extreme version of the MacBook than the iPhone Air is in the iPhone line-up. Should’ve been more like that.

I would’ve been interested in the Air if it had been more extreme like this, and without shiny borders.
 
I think Apple should’ve gone more extreme with the iPhone Air. I wish the display size had been smaller so it wouldn’t only be even lighter but also easier to cary. I wish they’d removed the USB-C port and made a portless phone (Apple can find a wireless solution for DFU mode).
I would love to see an Air Mini. I miss small phones. I should have bought the SE's before but I was in a bigger-is-better phase that I've since grown out of. I just want something that can fit in my pocket without it looking like I have an angular armadillo in my trousers.
 
Got the 17 Pro today for my other half in silver (I have a 17 Pro Max on order arrives 24-29 September) and I have to admit that I think they do not look as premium as the titanium iPhones. Kinda makes the Pro models look like the normal iPhone models with them made of aluminium.

I understand the reason for their aluminium construction, but it cheapens the look of the Pro model for sure. I suppose I'll get used to it as I expect Apple to stick with aluminium for a while.
 
Macrumors, you mentioned that the 17 Pro's have slightly more rounded edges making them more comfortable to hold. Does the Air have the same more rounded edges like the 17 Pro, or are they like the 16 Pro?
 
  • Like
Reactions: arc of the universe
"There is no titanium this year, because Apple discovered that it wasn't great for dissipating heat." - This made me chuckle. They didn't discover this, it's been known for a very long time (e.g. Ti thermals). I find it hard to believe Apple didn't know this. Titanium's thermal properties have been very well understood for a very long time. A high school textbook would tell you it is one of the more inferior metals (in any of its alloys) for this purpose.

Apple employs some of the world's most talented people, there's no way they didn't know. They chose it knowing this (for what reasons, likely only they can say).
 
Dang. Hearing about scratches on the deep blue iPhone 17 Pro makes me worried. Wondering if I should have went with silver.

I've never once found these stories to be credible. I remember how people were saying how easily "chipped" the M2 MacBook Air in the midnight color was, yet after years of constantly plugging peripherals in and out I still have yet to see any of that. Same goes for my MBP, same goes for my titanium banded phone...

I think some people just are super careless with their stuff and blow it up online so that they can try and get apple on their side for an exchange.
 
This was the first year in a long time I didn't upgrade my phone. I went to Best Buy hoping that maybe it would spark interest but the I hate hate hate the pros now. They're thick, heavy, and ugly (and I say this as someone who had a Pro Max for years). I like the Air but I use the camera a ton, if it wasn't for that I'd grab one of those.

The pros don't even look like Apple phones IMO, the sleekness is gone and it looks like a phone inside a cheap case.
 
I would love to see an Air Mini. I miss small phones. I should have bought the SE's before but I was in a bigger-is-better phase that I've since grown out of. I just want something that can fit in my pocket without it looking like I have an angular armadillo in my trousers.
I absolutely would buy an Air Mini. It’s so annoying that Apple sells 4 or 5 different kinds of phones and they all have to be big as hell. I’m waiting with my 13 Mini (running great on iOS 26 with a new battery) to see how the foldable turns out.
 
Last edited:
Tom’s Guide recently demonstrated on its YouTube channel that the iPhone 17 lasted only about 50 minutes longer than the iPhone Air.

One key distinction is that the iPhone Air uses Apple’s custom-designed cellular chip, while the rest of the iPhone lineup still relies on Qualcomm chips.

Looking ahead, we can expect a significant boost in battery performance once Apple gains more confidence in the capabilities of its in-house cellular chip.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.