Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Been looking at several reviews, hoping someone had shot low-light video to see if Apple has reduced or resolved the lens reflections in dark scenes with bright light sources in the frame.


In Justines video, she attends a concert and there are several moments where you can see lens flare reflections (12:56) in the upper right corner. It's disappointing that these still haven't been resolved. Internal reflections seem to be an issue going back as far as the iPhone 11.

1758133716072.png
 
  • Love
Reactions: arc of the universe
Been looking at several reviews, hoping someone had shot low-light video to see if Apple has reduced or resolved the lens reflections in dark scenes with bright light sources in the frame.


In Justines video, she attends a concert and there are several moments where you can see lens flare reflections (12:56) in the upper right corner. It's disappointing that these still haven't been resolved. Internal reflections seem to be an issue going back as far as the iPhone 11.

View attachment 2550761
The PetaPixel reviewer asked Apple, and they said they are using the same lens coatings on the 17 Pro Max as they did on the 16 Pro Max.
 
Most of the reviews seem to have tested Apple's 40W charger for the charging speed tests. Did anyone come across a review that explicitly tested a 3rd party charger (which are all currently non-AVS) and presented proof whether the 17s can or cannot charge more quickly? I'm disappointed by how much noise came from that poorly evidenced 9to5 article.
Replying to myself, but starting at ~3:00 from this review
one can see that 20 minutes of charging with a 3rd party charger achieves almost the same results as Apple's own 40w charger.
 
  • Like
Reactions: aohus and JPack
any words in reviews on thermals? i don’t wanna buy a pocket heater again like the iphone15pro … that was really bad
 
Replying to myself, but starting at ~3:00 from this review
one can see that 20 minutes of charging with a 3rd party charger achieves almost the same results as Apple's own 40w charger.

Mediastorm arguably offers one of the best reviews in the world, bar none. The intro alone is like a TV show. No wonder they got an exclusive interview with Tim Cook last week.

It's quite surprising how much production value they put into these reviews. It's not just a talking head holding an iPhone with random backdrops of parks or cars.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Diorama
I was hyped for it last week, and i really like the redesign but the more i think about it practically, getting by with my 16 Pro Max and the Apple Watch Ultra 2 for another year is totally doable.

The more reviews i watch the more im like "Ok im getting better battery life (which i never had a problem with before) and a slighty better camera front and back. I no longer do youtube, so all my photos and videos are for personal use and none of them are bad in any way shape or form, im thinking im going to sit this year out and just trade in the 16 pro max next year for the folding phone.

Last year the upgrade from the 15 to the 16 Pro max was mostly for the camera button, which i only use to launch the camera quickly and thats it.

Other then that and the phone hasnt overheated when recording (i barely if ever record more then a minuets worth of footage anyway now im off youtube) im perfectly fine sitting this year out.

Im going to wait for flossy carters review on youtube to be the end all be all take on the phone but yeah, they are nice upgrades but not major in any way (espically the ultra 3)
 
exceptional review coming from chinese-based tech influencers. they're phenomenal in terms of how granular they go with their review of the iphone.

apparently there is a gap on the back between the ceramic glass and aluminum unibody. it is also visible with the naked eye. tolerance levels may vary with each phone.
 
I don’t understand how Engadget and The Verge rated the Pixel 10 higher than the iPhone 17. The Pixel offers less storage, a midrange processor, and a midrange camera system—yet it costs more. Its only advantage seems to be onboard AI, which many argue isn’t even that practical.

In terms of value, it’s last year’s hardware dressed up with AI marketing, while the iPhone 17 delivers stronger performance and better optics. Yet somehow, reviewers still give the Pixel the edge.

It doesn’t add up.
 
I don’t understand how Engadget and The Verge rated the Pixel 10 higher than the iPhone 17. The Pixel offers less storage, a midrange processor, and a midrange camera system—yet it costs more. Its only advantage seems to be onboard AI, which many argue isn’t even that practical.

In terms of value, it’s last year’s hardware dressed up with AI marketing, while the iPhone 17 delivers stronger performance and better optics. Yet somehow, reviewers still give the Pixel the edge.

It doesn’t add up.
I think the Pixel 10 takes amazing photos. I'm sure it's all the google AI stuff in the background making the photos extra nice.

While Apple is 100% dependent on the actual camera system, because they can't even make a Siri that knows more than starting timers
 
I would like to know if the heat development is better than that of the iPhone 15 Pro because that is the main reason for me to switch/upgrade
 
A review that directly calls out the night lens flares, yup still here :(


The rest of the review is pretty good!
Everyone should be calling it out on every review and should have done so since it first started occurring, maybe then it would have been resolved along time ago as it’s totally ridiculous on such an expensive phone.

It’s something that puts me off iPhones as it ruins night photos and videos.

iPhones literally crap themselves when there’s any kind of bright light.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.