this is exactly how they were able to make the iphone thinner than the blackjack
After half a week of only having my iPhone for internet access, I will willingly pay extra for a 3g iPhone that's double the size that has 5 hour battery life.
..The fact that you appear to have one and are using it to make the opposite point baffles me...
I don't have one, but I've gotten the chance to use one very often. I am aware of battery life issues regarding the blackjack, but it's not like I get 24h usage from my non-3g iPhone either (and although that might drive in the point that 3g on iPhone would have huge implications on the already pathetic battery life...).
...That may be the reason why 3g wasn't part of the desgin...
I'm sorry, even though Apple might be new to the whole industry does not mean that others take only half the time to design and start manufacturing a new phone just cause they have the expertise and experience. Apple didn't hire complete newbies fresh out of universities. Apple itself may not have had the experience, but the people Apple hired certainly did.
Plus wifi is being deployed at a faster rate than 3G is being rolled out....Plus they are working with Metro areas to deploy city wide wifi. So it will just be a matter of time til wifi over takes 3G anyways. Just my two cents!
Are you saying widespread 802.16 deployment is that imminent?
Or that it's cheap and easy to deploy wifi mesh networks?
Google's own 802.11b/g mesh network still doesn't cover all of Mountain View and has extremely slow speeds rivalling EDGE sometimes, ran into some snags, and was not very cheap. In addition, if you want to use it indoors, you're mostly out of luck. Mountain View is geographically and population-wise not very large.
Not only is Wifi the future, but it is a solution with freedom.
Would you rather have ATT control your data access or have the ability to use the internet for free? Anyone can set up a great WiFi, but only the big corporations can set up 3G..Let's see; less money, more freedom, better battery life and better performance....hmmmm tough choice.
Nothing is free. Nor is a mesh network cheap. Or free. Or necessarily secure. Or free. (repeat 100x)
Personally, I'd worry about security concerns with public and open wireless networks, given some of the IDIOTIC decisions made by the iPhone team at apple in regards to that little (or, maybe not so little) aspect.
But many of us find it a great inconvenience to drive to a Panera Bread, etc. to get Wifi. I'd still like to know where everyone's getting this constant free fast Wifi cuz I sure can't get it on the road in a car, outside at a picnic, etc. etc.
I can't not agree with you. I almost never find open/secure+auth networks unless I'm at a coffee shop or restaurant. And most of the time I use edge is not when I'm at a restaurant or coffee shop.
Honestly. To all those iPhone users out there who have miraculously free wifi wherever they go (that don't live in a place like mountain view)...where do you live and what do you do to get free wifi? I've had a laptop since forever, I've had mobile devices with wifi, I now have my iPhone...I have never encountered such a plethora of open usable networks such as the ones you people here are describing. Never. Never over years of having wifi on my laptops.
If you're trying to browse while driving, you might want to re-think your driving habits....
I've gotten passengers to look up directions on gmaps for me on my iPhone while I was driving whenever my gps nav system hated me. Works pretty well. And I've taken pics and emailed them in the car (while I wasn't driving), like
this.
Good... now they should run a test and see if the extra amount of battery life makes up for the extra amount of time needed to load larger websites in crappy areas with edge
</sarcasm>
Maybe you meant to be sarcastic, but even though 3g and 3g coverage is ******, it's still noticeably faster (imo).
I've relegated myself to browsing mobile versions of sites when I have the opportunity...regular pages take way too long to load, if at all. Waste of a nice mobile browser that works nicely with wifi, but since that's almost never except at home (when I'd use a computer instead)...
Hmm.. the first time I read maokh's post I assumed it was in refference to TCP windows ... are we talking about that or screen resolution/size issues?
My bad, I must have been half asleep when I read that
