iPhone 4g Apples pictures seem off.

Discussion in 'Digital Photography' started by waloshin, Jun 8, 2010.

  1. waloshin macrumors 68040

    waloshin

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2008
    #1
    Nikon d40

    This image is raw from the camera no editing at all.

    [​IMG]

    This image below is edited which looks very simular to the iPhone pictures. over saturated.

    [​IMG]

    Who agrees?

    Apples images:

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  2. NeGRit0 macrumors 6502a

    NeGRit0

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2008
    Location:
    Las Vegas, Nv
    #2
    Those came from an iPhone??
     
  3. MattSepeta macrumors 65816

    MattSepeta

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2009
    Location:
    375th St. Y
    #3
    What do you mean?

    I am confident that Apple intends for them to look that way.

    Apple = new and hip
    Over saturated+overexposed = new and hip

    Ergo apples new hip iphone takes new hip blown out saturated pictures.

    Do they look good? Debatable. Will people eat it up? Absolutely.
     
  4. waloshin thread starter macrumors 68040

    waloshin

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2008
    #4
  5. NeGRit0 macrumors 6502a

    NeGRit0

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2008
    Location:
    Las Vegas, Nv
    #5
    Not that im calling anyone a liar, but i'd like to see some Exif Data on those photos....
     
  6. James L macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2004
    #6
    Why ask if you aren't going to believe the answer?
     
  7. Abyssgh0st macrumors 68000

    Abyssgh0st

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2009
    Location:
    Norman, OK
    #7
    And Steve explicitly said that "these were taken from the iPhone 4, with nothing else done to them."
     
  8. pianojoe macrumors 6502

    pianojoe

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2001
    Location:
    N 49.50121 E008.54558
    #8
    So why don't you do so? It'a all there.
     
  9. GoCubsGo macrumors Nehalem

    GoCubsGo

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2005
    #9
    Actually, over saturated yes, over exposed ... not exactly. There's a difference between the two. ;)

    Ummm ask Apple then. Doubt you'll get it from here.
     
  10. Jay42 macrumors 65816

    Jay42

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2005
    #10
    I'm willing to give Apple the benefit of the doubt and say that they are actually untouched....

    However, I'm almost positive that the new camera processing software one there boosts saturation, contrast, and sharpness (just as flat screen tv's do out of the box)....
     
  11. Razeus macrumors 603

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2008
    #11
    I'm with Negrito on this one. I'm calling shens on those iPhone pics. Those pics look like they are from a DSLR with some lighting equipment.

    Just like I'm calling shens on the quality of the picture they show on the FaceTime feature. I seriously doubt the picture is clear and vibrant as that on a .3mp camera.

    Apple is good at presentation, I'll given them that.
     
  12. mtbdudex macrumors 68000

    mtbdudex

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2007
    Location:
    SE Michigan
    #12
    When I went to Apple site this is what I get....so iPhone either don't capture the exif data, or it was stripped to "hide" something.
     
  13. designguy79 macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2009
    Location:
    Michigan
    #13
    FYI, it is actually iPhone 4.

    I imagine that "iPhone 4G" will be a future moniker for one that can actually use the 4G signal...
     
  14. NeGRit0 macrumors 6502a

    NeGRit0

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2008
    Location:
    Las Vegas, Nv
    #14
    Who said i wouldnt believe it?

    Yes, and Mr. Jobs has never bent or stretched the thruth. Or god forbid.... Lie.

    No, its not. I was at work when i originally posted, but at home i checked my Exif info program and there was none.

    Love your snarky comments, but ummm when did i ask anyone here to provide it? Obviously no one here would have access to the exif if it isnt embedded in the the photo, which it isnt....

    Agreed, I have the Evo and my front facing camera is like a webcam from 1999. Lol.
     

Share This Page