Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_5 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8L1 Safari/6533.18.5)

I could see this happening, and it coincides with other rumors: iPhone 4, as we know it, becomes the cheaper iCloud phone, but in a new 4S flavor (goodbye old iPhone 4). Then, they release the new phone to replace the $199 and $299 iPhone 4s - the new iPhone 5. It makes sense to me. And as far as Apple's concerned, they've then filled the "cheap" phone avenue with this redesigned iPhone 4S (with better battery, antenna, and display?), and you've released the mouth-watering new iPhone 5 that people are hoping for. Thoughts?
 
Is it just me or reading about Apple rumors after a day of Jobs resignation feels a bit strange?
 
Don't think they will call the new iPhone 4 the 4s. I just think it will be refereed to just as the iphone 4. What would the "S" mean anyway? Slower?

If it is going to be a cheaper version of the ip4 it certainly won't be Speedier.
 
Interesting how the only 'leaked' parts of the next iPhone are consistently being stated as for a cheap iPhone 4S! People refusing to accept the fact that this could be the next iPhone full stop? I have yet to see any iPhone 5 casings etc......
 
Makes sense

iPhone 5 $199 (16GB) $299 (32GB)
iPhone 4S $99 (8GB)
iPhone 3GS Free/with contract (8GB)
-------------
or

iPhone 4S $199 (16GB) $299 (32GB)
iPhone 4 $99 (8GB)
iPhone 3GS Free/with contract (8GB)
 
It should be called the iPhone 4C.
Why?
Everyone is trying to foresee something they should just be waiting for.


...And the C would stand for 'Cheap'...
 
A cheaper iPhone 4 (whether they call it the S or not) doesn't mean cheaper quality, but cheaper to produce and more profitable for Apple.

The success of the 3GS at $49 is a testament to how people are blinded by the purchase cost and don't consider the monthly cost of owning an iPhone.

What would happen if the iPhone 4 was dropped, replaced by an even faster phone, but still $99 and slow compared to a new iPhone 5? The cheapest iPhone would be better than last years model.

And if they were all world phones...
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A5302b Safari/7534.48.3)



Are you guys idiots?!? The story said they would be lower cost, lower capacity iPhone 4's, it even said "alongside the iPhone 5" in the first damn sentence. Think the $99 3GS currently. And the $99 3G before it.

What's your problem? I was implicitly questioning the accuracy of those claims, the idea that the other new form factor is definitely the iPhone 5 and that this is a 4S. Can you read...or write?

4th word in the article..."rumored"
Thanks for the rescue.
 
Last edited:
So I finally caved in and registered just to say that the iPhone I have right in front of me - from the UK - has the antenna breaks in exactly the same place (and one to the right of the headphone jack).

So this isn't 'new'.
 
Last edited:
What's your problem? I was implicitly questioning the accuracy of those claims, the idea that the other new form factor is definitely the iPhone 5 and that this is a 4S. Can you read...or write?

What's your name? Couldn't tell from your signature. :p
 
Don't think they will call the new iPhone 4 the 4s. I just think it will be refereed to just as the iphone 4. What would the "S" mean anyway? Slower?

If it is going to be a cheaper version of the ip4 it certainly won't be Speedier.

What I'm trying to say, to be more clear, is that I could see them making improvements to the "cheaper" iPhone 4 that would qualify it for an "S" moniker. We've heard about a cheaper plastic back. They could offset the cost of a wider display, or more RAM. And, at the same time, they are making up for the bad antenna with a fix in this new design. It would be an improved iPhone 4, or 4S. And it's big brother would be the iPhone 5.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_5 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8L1 Safari/6533.18.5)

They won't introduce a 4s and a 5.

1- new product confusion. Apple typically makes it easy to decide what to buy

2- if they give the 4s a better screen, battery life, etc, what is left for the 5 without making it too expensive?
 
Hope this isn't the iPhone 5 housing. I'm ready for a form factor change.

I really hope it's like the recent rumors have indicated. Slim, tapered, rounder, bigger screen in the same size footprint.

If it's the same form factor as the 4 I'll be disappointed. I'll still buy one and sell my 4 to pay for it, but I hope for a rounder shape.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A5302b Safari/7534.48.3)



Are you guys idiots?!? The story said they would be lower cost, lower capacity iPhone 4's, it even said "alongside the iPhone 5" in the first damn sentence. Think the $99 3GS currently. And the $99 3G before it.

Ouch. This is a rumor. That means that there's no telling for 100% sure what exactly it is. There's nothing wrong with saying 'I hope this is not the iPhone5" which is the same as saying "I hope this IS the iPhone4S and not the OTHER new iPhone".

Lighten up.

----------

iPhone 5 $199 (16GB) $299 (32GB)
iPhone 4S $99 (8GB)
iPhone 3GS Free/with contract (8GB)
-------------
or

iPhone 4S $199 (16GB) $299 (32GB)
iPhone 4 $99 (8GB)
iPhone 3GS Free/with contract (8GB)

Nah. Time for a capacity bump. 64 should be on offer. Hopefully 32 as the min. I am kinda tired of 16 GB being my phone :)
 
Is it me or does it look like that it's just flipped over?

Actually, yes, you're right! If you flipped over that shot, then zoomed out slightly i think it is the same part. Even down to the 2 diagonal holes that spot weld the small square plate in place.
 
A cheaper iPhone 4 (whether they call it the S or not) doesn't mean cheaper quality, but cheaper to produce and more profitable for Apple.

The success of the 3GS at $49 is a testament to how people are blinded by the purchase cost and don't consider the monthly cost of owning an iPhone.

Actually the (second place) success of the 3GS proves exactly the opposite. If people were really blinded by purchase price and ignoring quality, the cheaper 3GS would sell more than the 4X more expensive 4. But it doesn't.

----------

What's your name? Couldn't tell from your signature. :p

Jesus. What a terrible signature.

----------

Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_5 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8L1 Safari/6533.18.5)

They won't introduce a 4s and a 5.

1- new product confusion. Apple typically makes it easy to decide what to buy

2- if they give the 4s a better screen, battery life, etc, what is left for the 5 without making it too expensive?

1- 3GS and 4? Hello?
2- Who said it would get a better screen and battery life?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.