I'll be impressed if they give it the Timex test of old. Strap it to an outboard motor blade and tool around the bay.
Honestly though, it was pointless. It was a video of an iPhone being gently set in some soft dirt by a balloon, and the iPhone happened to have a case on. I seriously doubt the outcome would have been any different without the case.
150rpm isn't a lot. It's just over 3 revs per second. Most people can go that fast by standing and spinning on the spot (not for long though), and a lot faster in an office chair![]()
Well, yeah. Sort of my point. There was that scandal earlier this week where Apple got a patent for action cameras, and the GoPro investors panicked, worried that Apple was gonna come take over there space. But I don't think Apple understands that space enough to be any kind of threat in it.They are 2 very different products designed to handle very different set of conditions.
Is it a fair statement to say that the same result would have occurred had a naked iPhone been put to the same test?
Really boring, stupid video.
If the iPhone had just been dropped from 101 K feet and survived the landing from nothing more than the case, that would have been amazing.
After all, my OtterBox saved my 6+ from a drop of over 3 feet onto a porcelain tiled floor.![]()
It was a marketing ploy. And there will be some who see the video and then purchase the case.What exactly does the case do? It's not like it's protecting the phone from the cold.... Seems like a marketing ploy to me.
150rpm isn't a lot. It's just over 3 revs per second. Most people can go that fast by standing and spinning on the spot (not for long though), and a lot faster in an office chair![]()
Isn't it 2.5 revs per second?