Sidebar Sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

iPhone 7 Plus geek bench

BLUEBLASTER

BLUEBLASTER

macrumors regular
Original poster
Jun 28, 2016
144
98

Attachments

  • iphone7plus-geekbench.jpg
    iphone7plus-geekbench.jpg
    33.7 KB · Views: 157
I doubt this for several reasons. Mainly that the phone is labelled 'iPhone9,3'. This would go against the previous 6 & 6S which have been labelled iPhoneX,1 and iPhoneX,2 respectively. Whilst it's entirely possible for Apple to change this, I really doubt they would.
Also, the device appears to be running iOS 10.1, and we have never seen a new iPhone running on the X.1 operating system at launch.
Personally, I think this is fake purely as it is very easy to fake benchmarks like this, and also partially because I'm hoping that an iPhone 7 Plus sticks to the rumours we have heard with 3GB of RAM- and hopefully a slightly higher score.
 
It isn't about the iPhone itself. Its about A10. There have to be engineering samples of iOS devices that have A10, and iOS 10.1. It does not have to be related to iPhone, but to the chip, itself.
 
koyoot said:
It isn't about the iPhone itself. Its about A10. There have to be engineering samples of iOS devices that have A10, and iOS 10.1. It does not have to be related to iPhone, but to the chip, itself.
Click to expand...
True, something interesting about the X,3 devices is that we've never actually seen one. The iPhone SE was labelled as the iPhone8,4 and the 6S and 6S+ were both 8,1 and 8,2. It makes me really curious as to what the X,3 device actually is. Whether it's a testing device used by Apple- or something else.
 
Milese3 said:
True, something interesting about the X,3 devices is that we've never actually seen one. The iPhone SE was labelled as the iPhone8,4 and the 6S and 6S+ were both 8,1 and 8,2. It makes me really curious as to what the X,3 device actually is. Whether it's a testing device used by Apple- or something else.
Click to expand...
Very interesting indeed. Perhaps they're testing the successor to the iPhone SE?
 
koyoot said:
It isn't about the iPhone itself. Its about A10. There have to be engineering samples of iOS devices that have A10, and iOS 10.1. It does not have to be related to iPhone, but to the chip, itself.
Click to expand...

So the A10 is a dual-core 400MHz processor? As posted in the Beta 8 thread, I think this is fake. Phone identifier is off as mentioned above with the X,3 and the processor is definitely not accurate. Lastly, the 6s has 2005MB of RAM, seems odd this would be 5MB less.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom
Back