Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
As a bearded guy, I’m so glad this video reminds me not to carry my razor with me in the same pocket as my new phone.
 
Hmm just wondering if Apple is falsifying their multi-core cpu performance or if Apple is paying off Geekbench. I'm sure the more efficient cores are being used more than the high performance ones or vice versa. I know that all six cores can work at once but that has to be seldomly. MKBHD wouldn't have gotten this result if not.

View attachment 719872

I’d wait on the tinfoil hat theories. :)

DBB66515-E434-4B58-A57A-609D69A86F6A.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kengineer
I’d wait on the tinfoil hat theories. :)

View attachment 719882

As they say, there are lies, big lies and statistics. I would say that the test in geekbench responds well to A11 Bionic but anything else may not be as efficient. I would even go as far as to say that the CPU has been tailored for geekbench as you don't see that kind of difference in different tests.

You have to realize that Apple probably ensured that GeekBench would use all six cores at once but in reality only a couple of those cores will be used in actual real world usage. It will work like Big.Little. In android, usually four cores are always being used unlike iOS. The two high performance cores on the new iphones will do the grunt of the most stringent work while the low performance efficiency cores will be active for everything else. Think of the battery savings you need on your phones....you guys will never see all six cores running at once to get your so-called GeekBench scores (GeekBench app will be the only way you see it). Real World usage is the true defining factor.

Interestingly enough, there was a recent update to the GeekBench iOS app which could lend you to concluding that Apple and GeekBench may have worked hand in hand to ensure these results are taken at face value.
 
Last edited:
Very disappointed with the camera lens not being true sapphire and scratching at a level 6, especially without a protective raised ring. If we have to endure a camera hump, it should at least protect the lens!

Very true. And I would at least have expected the X not having the hump anymore. As that device is “the future” they should have figured this out by now. And if they don’t know how, make the phone a bit thicker so battery life goes up.
 
The glass on the back will be more prone to shatters and scratches. + that sapphire glass on camera lens is not durable it scratches on level 6 compared to htc sapphire display which scratched at level 8

The sapphire glass on the camera lens cover is durable. It's meant as a protectant layer to prevent against scratches, and coming from somebody that does not uses a case, I have zero scratches on my iPhone 7 Plus camera lens cover. I don't even have any scratches on my previous 6S Plus camera lens cover after two years of use. It's Interesting to see some of these tests, but they're not always indicative of real world experience, depending on how somebody treats their iPhone.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Ntombi
Interesting. If Apple aren’t using top grade sapphire glass for the camera lens then that is shameful given the price of an iPhone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: O.N.Y.X
The sapphire glass on the camera lens cover is durable. It's meant as a protectant layer to prevent against scratches, and coming from somebody that does not uses a case, I have zero scratches on my iPhone 7 Plus camera lens cover. I don't even have any scratches on my previous 6S Plus camera lens cover after two years of use. It's Interesting to see some of these tests, but they're not always indicative of real world experience, depending on how somebody treats their iPhone.

True, but I’m still very disappointed in the scratch resistance of the front glass.

I keep my iPhone 6S in a wallet type case and both the leather and the plastic bank cards have left scratches on the glass. They are not even superficial as I can feel them with my finger.

You can argue that a wallet case is a bad idea but I still feel that leather or plastic should not scratch the glass.
 
True, but I’m still very disappointed in the scratch resistance of the front glass.

I keep my iPhone 6S in a wallet type case and both the leather and the plastic bank cards have left scratches on the glass. They are not even superficial as I can feel them with my finger.

You can argue that a wallet case is a bad idea but I still feel that leather or plastic should not scratch the glass.

Initially, the iPhone has an oleophobic coating to help prevent against scratches. But that wears off over time, and I think when you have something thats constantly rubbing against the glass with plastic, it will scratch it due to the friction and pressure from being in your pocket. But overall, I have been pleased with the glass used on the iPhone displays. I don't have any scratches on mine, and as I previously mentioned, I don't use cases. But then again, I also treat my products carefully.
 
Initially, the iPhone has an oleophobic coating to help prevent against scratches. But that wears off over time, and I think when you have something thats constantly rubbing against the glass with plastic, it will scratch it due to the friction and pressure from being in your pocket. But overall, I have been pleased with the glass used on the iPhone displays. I don't have any scratches on mine, and as I previously mentioned, I don't use cases. But then again, I also treat my products carefully.

I would think leather and plastic should never scratch the glass no matter how long it rubs against it.

However the leather/plastic can keep other items trapped against the phone which can scratch it - dust, sand etc

Bit disappointed he didn't do a mohs test on the back
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sunny1990
As they say, there are lies, big lies and statistics. I would say that the test in geekbench responds well to A11 Bionic but anything else may not be as efficient. I would even go as far as to say that the CPU has been tailored for geekbench as you don't see that kind of difference in different tests.

You have to realize that Apple probably ensured that GeekBench would use all six cores at once but in reality only a couple of those cores will be used in actual real world usage. It will work like Big.Little. In android, usually four cores are always being used unlike iOS. The two high performance cores on the new iphones will do the grunt of the most stringent work while the low performance efficiency cores will be active for everything else. Think of the battery savings you need on your phones....you guys will never see all six cores running at once to get your so-called GeekBench scores (GeekBench app will be the only way you see it). Real World usage is the true defining factor.

Interestingly enough, there was a recent update to the GeekBench iOS app which could lend you to concluding that Apple and GeekBench may have worked hand in hand to ensure these results are taken at face value.


whatever helps you sleep at night.. ;)
 
I guess there is some upside to Apple recycling the same form factor for the fourth year in a row. When you have so much time to keep adding iterative improvements to your product, it really gets as refined as it can be.

It may be a tired old design, but it’s one that works.

so is the iPhone 5......still going strong
 
So except for the artificial benchmarks, actual usage between the two iPhones is negligible. Can't say that I'm surprised, the A10 is a great processor and will be more then up to the task.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Faitt and Sunny1990
not sure if this has been discussed, but in the third video, @04:01, the UI is turned sideways.

How is that possible? Is this exclusive to 8 and onward?

Capturesaasdasasd.JPG
 
Last edited:
Not gonna lie. The iPhone 5 / 5s design is still my personal favourite.

Just using one at work today for testing . Truth be told, when they update the SE to newer internals and 256, I'm in.
 
The UI has been able to rotate on the plus phones since iOS 8

it did look familiar, but my 7+ does not do that
which setting to look into?

nevermind

Open the Settings app.
Tap Display & Brightness.
Under Display Zoom, tap View.
By default, your iPhone is set to standard, which is what allows your iPhone Plus to switch between portrait and Landscape mode.
To turn off Landscape mode, tap Zoomed.
 
They said the same thing about the iPhone 7 and my 7 Plus go micro scratches all over the display while my old 6 is still flawless
It's the opposite for me - my 6 ended up with a number of small scratches on the screen but my 7 doesn't have any at the same point in ownership (i.e., about 1 year after purchasing).
 
As they say, there are lies, big lies and statistics. I would say that the test in geekbench responds well to A11 Bionic but anything else may not be as efficient. I would even go as far as to say that the CPU has been tailored for geekbench as you don't see that kind of difference in different tests.

You have to realize that Apple probably ensured that GeekBench would use all six cores at once but in reality only a couple of those cores will be used in actual real world usage. It will work like Big.Little. In android, usually four cores are always being used unlike iOS. The two high performance cores on the new iphones will do the grunt of the most stringent work while the low performance efficiency cores will be active for everything else. Think of the battery savings you need on your phones....you guys will never see all six cores running at once to get your so-called GeekBench scores (GeekBench app will be the only way you see it). Real World usage is the true defining factor.

Interestingly enough, there was a recent update to the GeekBench iOS app which could lend you to concluding that Apple and GeekBench may have worked hand in hand to ensure these results are taken at face value.

I know you can't reply, but unlike the A10 where what you stated is true( demanding work the two performance cores are active, low demand, the two efficiency cores are active), the A11 can use all 6 cores at once if given a high demanding task.
 
The glass on the back will be more prone to shatters and scratches. + that sapphire glass on camera lens is not durable it scratches on level 6 compared to htc sapphire display which scratched at level 8

You’re not understanding this.

Sapphire is always a 9 on these tests. It’s never anything else. It wasn’t said that the sapphire was a 6 on the camera lens. The glass back is a 6. That’s different. The display is not sapphire, it’s glass, and is about the same as the back.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.