No, Porsche is literally a case study used in B-schools right now to illustrate failure and fixed cost traps.
Beanoir's reference to Porsche is an example of people with zero understanding of business but think low volumes work. It did not work for Porsche, why would it work for Apple?
Porsche had huge warning signs back in 2022-2023. Their "exclusivity-first" production strategy which deliberately constrains volume contributed greatly to the company's overall financial problems today. They have huge fixed costs and in automotive, making a car like GT3 Touring with less than 1,000 units is a big mistake. Porsche spent a certain amount for dedicated engineering, testing, tooling, and marketing to make so few units. The GT3 Touring pissed off dealers too because they too have fixed costs to cover.
In short, Porsche was spending heavily on electrification R&D and battery manufacturing. At the same time, they used "exclusivity-first" strategy. This is like carrying two huge burdens at once.
Apple is spending a huge amount on AI infrastructure, hardware, chips, and new product categories. iPhone Air is low volume just like GT3 Touring.