The “old one”? You mean their previous MagSafe battery pack that was
discontinued 2 years ago?
What has that got to do with the discussion and the iPhone Air?
History is always relevant to hypothetical discussions such as yours. In this case your point, which you keep repeating is "it
looks a bit awkward. As if the manufacturer doesn’t quite trust its battery life is competitive"
My question was, so when Apple released a battery pack for the iPhone Pro, it didnt trust the iPhone Pro's battery life? You cant have it both ways. Well you can assert it, you just are wrong.
I don’t need to “google” that stuff. I can just consult Apple’s in-store offerings:
Ignorance is bliss. I got it. Why let facts get in the way of your opinions? So. Let me educate you sir. As is known, apple just repurposed the Air's internal battery (you know to keep costs down), for the battery pack. As the Air's geometry is different it doesn't work with the other phones (well, it does when rotated 90°). Apple has, as you know, been in the external battery market before because they see a market opportunity. And their implementation has always been been slick. not my first rodeo with battery packs. I prefer them to third party for a variety of reasons.
btw, past batteries targeted 60%, just like this one. It is thin to match the Air's design. Is that hard to comprehend?
- The iPhone Air is the only iPhone that Apple (the phone’s manufacturer) sells a first-party battery pack for.
- And that battery pack lists only the iPhone Air as being compatible.
See above on compatibility. Apple designed a battery for the air using air's components. they supplied it for the same reason they have made external batteries in the past. And like the past, it is for folks that perhaps are on a flight or some other reason they are not near a charging outlet. Also like the past, the relative lack of third party batteries for the mini no doubt prompted Apple to fill this market subset. I have seen third party batteries for the Air, they are easily twice its width. Not convenient. Shrugs.
And yes, I know that there may be third-party battery packs. Apple could have well left it to third parties providing battery packs for the Air. But they for some reason didn’t - they felt to do their own.
Well, again, the relative lack of third party batteries for the specifically for the mini no doubt prompted Apple to fill this market subset. Oh wait, that doesnt count because it's History?
So my point still stands: it looks a bit awkward. As if the manufacturer doesn’t quite trust its battery life is competitive
Shrugs, who really cares? Honestly, who cares? This is a trivial marketing point, I know you are a world class marketing guru, but Apple in the past has proven they know something about marketing too. If someone is concerned about the battery life, they might be encouraged they have options. Might they? Goes both ways. Also, a lot of people do their homework and can figure out if the concern is real or not. Some people like facts.
For anyone except the most design-conscious - or people that always need to have the very newest tech - and show it off? (Again, I believe that’s a minority of consumers and the iPhone user base).
Condescending much? There is obviously a large subset of people tired of heavy, bulky phones. I wont speculate on minority or majority, what matters to Apple is will they sell enough to make it worth their while. We will find out next year. I am not big on idle speculation.