The Edge's color rendition is way, way worse. There's a lot more to quality images than MPs. Tom's has a great comparison they dropped today, if you want to see what I mean.
I'll miss the wide angle lens, but I'll live.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
iPhone Air Reviews: Is the Ultra-Thin Design Worth the Compromises?
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
I'll miss the wide angle lens, but I'll live.
Yeah, no one's putting titanium anything into a loss leader. That shows a misunderstanding of Apple's approach, which is to fork the product line into a truck/sports car analogy. The Air is the sports or halo car that will bring even more people into the stores. That couldn't be said for the Plus or the dearly departed, beloved mini.
Last edited:
Actually, your list of advantages was kind of silly and intentionally ignored advantages the Air has over the Edge, which is, you know, biased. "2 grams". Come on.
As for reviews, I'm not talking about YT influencers; rather more standard media whose embargoes dropped at 6am. Apparently you haven't read those? CNET, WSJ, NYTimes, 9to5Mac, CNN, The Verge, Engadget, Tom's Hardware, PC Mag (a noted Apple supporter, right?). Surely the conspiracy isn't that vast?
If good enough is similar to the good enough battery life of the 15 Pro or 16 Pro, battery life becomes less of an issue. The limitations of the camera is the bigger issue (possibly) for me.
You see that with Vision Pro. Too expensive. So they convince themselves it sucks. Has no use case. Etc.
Myself I was never considering anything below a pro. Besides I think the pros look better. Bigger screen. It’s the only part of phone I look at. lol.
iPod touch like with a big camera bump is pretty much iPhone air. Slower than the base model. Crap battery. One camera. Crappy speaker. In terms of looks my pro 15 still looks better than any of the 17s. But I don’t get a phone based on how the back looks. Don’t care too much.
Now if the iPhone air was something better. In some way. Thinner or a bit lighter isn’t it. I’d even consider a new screen tech. Something. Anything. It’s worse than a base iPhone. Imagine having this 2-3 years.
WIRED's Julian Chokkattu on battery life:
"Heavy users will undoubtedly need to top up this phone during the day. On one travel day, I took the phone off the charger at 5:30 am and used it extensively for navigation, music streaming, phone calls, and Instagram Reeling, and I hit 2 percent by 4:30 pm."
One way to significantly extend battery time, when using a phone in your car for navigation, is to place it on a car mount that's connected to the car's 12V outlet via an adapter in the outlet, or if your car mount doesn't have its own power input port, just use a cable to connect the phone to the adapter in the 12V port. The constant back-and-forth negotiation with cellphone towers while driving around using GPS is a really heavy power draw.
"Heavy users will undoubtedly need to top up this phone during the day. On one travel day, I took the phone off the charger at 5:30 am and used it extensively for navigation, music streaming, phone calls, and Instagram Reeling, and I hit 2 percent by 4:30 pm."
One way to significantly extend battery time, when using a phone in your car for navigation, is to place it on a car mount that's connected to the car's 12V outlet via an adapter in the outlet, or if your car mount doesn't have its own power input port, just use a cable to connect the phone to the adapter in the 12V port. The constant back-and-forth negotiation with cellphone towers while driving around using GPS is a really heavy power draw.
It's going to be tough for me to lose Macro and the wide angle lens but I think I can survive. It's likely that within just a generation or two Apple will have this addressed in any event.
For context, the paragraphs preceding that one in that article:
"..The battery life of the iPhone Air is better than I expected.
The Air was generally able to last a full day with average use for me. I hit around five hours of screen-on time with around 18 percent left by 10:30 pm. This worked for me, but my expectations were also very low. I had to baby the battery so much on the last ultra thin phone I tested, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge, and I was surprised to find this wasn't the case with the Air..."
Shorter battery life, single camera, thermal throttled performance, needs external battery pack just to be barely all-day.
Too many compromises for a $1k phone. I’d say it’s DOA 🤷🏻♂️😉
The real star of 17 Series is actually the vanilla, base model 17. You get so many upgrades for the same $700.
Too many compromises for a $1k phone. I’d say it’s DOA 🤷🏻♂️😉
The real star of 17 Series is actually the vanilla, base model 17. You get so many upgrades for the same $700.
You clearly didn't read it perfectly because if you had you would have noticed this part of the post.
I'll bold the part in question for you: They have the numbers and clearly those numbers indicate that, despite a vocal minority, the smaller phones don't sell in numbers that would justify the cost of manufacture.
People clearly don't want smaller iPhones otherwise Apple would still be making them but if you're going to continue to argue semantics then I'll just take myself out of this discussion.
Cost isn’t a concern for me but I almost went with the iPhone 17 which is $800 not $700. It is a better value.
I chose the Air because it has a slightly larger screen and 50% more memory and a much faster CPU. I do use business applications and those improvements will be well worth it for me personally.
Its one camera also has a better sensor than the one on the 17.
Thanks for correction, 17 base model is $800. I just feel A19 Pro in the Air will still be throttled most of the time, not to mention 5 GPU cores vs 6 in the 17 Pro/Max. I just feel the thinness compromises so much it may performs closer to base 17 instead. In the end it feels like a concept tech demo instead of a phone that people should buy.
I’m guessing it depends on your use case . If you are coming from pretty much any older phone the iPhone air will have better battery than that and the chip is more powerful than that so for your experience it will be better than what you are used to . The base phone is the sensible purchase as it pretty much does everything for a great price . I guess if you want a bigger screen then you are torn between the air and the pro max which the pro max approaching a bit too big and heavy territory
What I’m coming from and the direction I’m going, so agree. Just not sure if I’ll be satisfied with the camera. I love taking photos and having the telephoto. We shall see!
I wouldn’t want an Air as my main phone, because I want both the telephoto and ultrawide lenses plus long battery life. On the other hand, it’d be great as my work phone, because for that device I want a big screen, but don’t need high-performance cameras (because it rarely shoots anything other than whiteboards), or maximum battery life (because I don’t log that much time on the work phone). Right now my work phone is an SE3, which is nice and light, but the small screen interferes with my ability to peruse email attachments and issue replies without cracking open my laptop. I am sure that I am not the only person with this use case.
"...battery life is just okay..."
It's better than my iPhone 15 Pro's.
It's better than my iPhone 15 Pro's.
Any Android phone is just a counterfeit iPhone. Android is counterfeit iOS, and it's about as bad as any counterfeit.
I'm old enough to remember when Jobs announced the iPhone. Android at that moment was counterfeit Blackberry. It sucked. The day Jobs demo'd the iPhone, they started counterfeiting iOS.
Android still sucks. Just get an iPhone.
>> despite a vocal minority, the smaller phones don't sell in numbers that would justify the cost of manufacture.
This does not change whether people want small phone or not though, and people do.
>> People clearly don't want smaller iPhones
No, people do want smaller iPhones. This is independent of whether it's 'worth it' for Apple to manufacture them.
You do realise it's perfectly possible for people to want smaller iphones, but also not be 'worth it' for Apple to manufacture? the 2 are not mutually exclusive.
Don't let the door hit you on the way out.
I want the phone to be light because I like to read eBooks on my phone. A thick phone in your pocket, with a giant plateau bulge and a big techwoven case on it? Nice. LOL. Pro buyers might need the lanyard! As for all the MOAR MOAR stuff, why would one need that when you probably also have a Mac or iPad that gives you all of that already? This iPhone Air has more power, better battery life, and a bigger/better screen than my current iPhone 15 Pro.
This enlarged camera bump will encourage more of us to place the iPhone face down when we are sitting at a table. That’s good for us, don’t need to stare at the screen every moment and some notifications can wait. 
Go a step further and don't have your phone on the table. Basic manners.This enlarged camera bump will encourage more of us to place the iPhone face down when we are sitting at a table. That’s good for us, don’t need to stare at the screen every moment and some notifications can wait.
Either you missed the joke or you are playing 5D chess and we are missing your joke. Either way good job.
