Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
As for Judge Alsup, he was completely right. He applied the actual facts of the case to the letter of the law, and reached the correct decision based on the statutes (Sherman/Clayton) and the case law/precedent. If he had done anything but throw out Psystar's antitrust claims he would be making new law that directly conflicts with the black letter statutes.

Believe what you want, but it tells me you don't know how to read because it's crystal clear he was wrong in plain 3rd grade English. He's just another judge writing BS laws from the bench that contradict the laws written by Congress 100%.
 
Believe what you want, but it tells me you don't know how to read because it's crystal clear he was wrong in plain 3rd grade English. He's just another judge writing BS laws from the bench that contradict the laws written by Congress 100%.

Please tell me what part of his decision does not comport with the statutes. Although I am an intellectual property attorney, it's possible you, who I assume have never been to law school, caught something I missed - to my feeble mind, his decision not only matched what is required by the statutes, but matched the relevant precedent.
 
Please tell me what part of his decision does not comport with the statutes. Although I am an intellectual property attorney, it's possible you, who I assume have never been to law school, caught something I missed - to my feeble mind, his decision not only matched what is required by the statutes, but matched the relevant precedent.

He ruled in favor of Apple. ;)
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.