Huge iPhone Security Flaw Puts All Private Information at Risk
Really? Because I don't have a pass-code on my iPhone at the moment. Just don't let random folks use your phone?
Gotta love the AOL bloggers and their TimeWarner craziness.
I agree with your point of sensationalism, but you realize that it's Engadget that is partnered with AOL-TimeWarner, not Gizmodo, right? They have no affiliation.
Gizmodo is a part of Gawker Media, though, and right now they are being sponsored by Verizon--who I am sure is proud to present iPhone flaws.
"iPhone users who want to guard against this flaw have a really simple solution - in (Settings) General access the Home Button Settings, and switch double-clicking from 'Phone Favorites' (default) to iPod. " - taken from 9to5mac.com
why didn't macrumors post this?
I've got news for you guys. Last week, I set a passcode and forgot it. Since my phone is jailbroken (I'm on 2.0.1) and has ssh installed, I did some research and found 2 things that need to be changed to completely disable the passcode and it's surprisingly easy. If anyone wants these instructions then let me know
Not a big deal in my eyes... If some hacker gets your phone, believe me, a passcode isn't stopping them.
why would I email apple ???
This fix depends on you running a jailbroken iPhone with ssh,neither of which is supported by apple to begin with. It's not a bug or exploit. It's a hack based
on being able to access the underlying os via ssh.
Not a big deal in my eyes... If some hacker gets your phone, believe me, a passcode isn't stopping them.
Hehe. Just a while ago I wrote here in the forums that i cannot understand why Apple don't encrypt the iPhone's storage and everybody told me that that was unnecessary since the passcode alone protects the data well enough.
And now that it has been revealed that the passcode doesn't protect anything, it turns out that it is not a big deal, since a passcode wouldn't stop anyone anyway.
I vote for on-disk encryption again. Why didn't Apple include that feature?
Am I correct in understanding that we are all commenting on a MacRumors post that references a Gizmodo post, which in turn references a MacRumors forum posting as its original source?
Just want to make sure I'm getting this right.
Hehe. Just a while ago I wrote here in the forums that i cannot understand why Apple don't encrypt the iPhone's storage and everybody told me that that was unnecessary since the passcode alone protects the data well enough.
And now that it has been revealed that the passcode doesn't protect anything, it turns out that it is not a big deal, since a passcode wouldn't stop anyone anyway.
I vote for on-disk encryption again. Why didn't Apple include that feature?
wow, the comments on this thread can't be more stupid. maybe it's all the 13 year olds who get their phone paid by daddy and who don't have privacy concerns because they don't work and spend their time on myspace
a lot of people need to leave their phone in their office while on a meeting, in a different work place, a laboratory or so. also you need to give your phone to security if you want to enter a company sometimes. in those cases it's not that the colleagues or security is going to professionally hack your phone. but if it's that easy they might just sniff around your contacts and e-mails. who want's that...
so stop making stupid remarks like "we don't need a passcode anyway because a pro can hack it" or "your dumb for letting others use your phone!!11!!!".![]()
Exactly i could care less that someone got pass the passcode. Because I could gaurantee you that they are not going to be like "oh i could'nt figure out the code so heres your phone back"