Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
iPhone SE Camera
- Thread starter manishans
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Not if you're coming from a phone with even less features, or a slower phone.
[doublepost=1461501755][/doublepost]
Everyone has to compensate for something. That's why I got the SE.
Thanks everyone for your feedback!
Why i asked if the cameras are same because a few weeks back there was an article on 9to5mac which had a camera comparison between the two and the SE pics looked better actually.
I see some people say the SE is a downgrade but for me its not because I like the SE size and the old 5S design. I rarely use force touch and i never use the front cam.
SE isn't released officially in my country, so i'll wait for that and see the price comparison.
Why i asked if the cameras are same because a few weeks back there was an article on 9to5mac which had a camera comparison between the two and the SE pics looked better actually.
I see some people say the SE is a downgrade but for me its not because I like the SE size and the old 5S design. I rarely use force touch and i never use the front cam.
SE isn't released officially in my country, so i'll wait for that and see the price comparison.
Old Port in Montreal
Good photos. I don't like how the dark ones don't show light like in android. Otherwise good.
Nice! Did you zoom when you took these pictures? Alot of visible noise.
Old Port in Montreal
Old Port in Montreal
I'm sorry, but these are horrible quality photos. If you think these are good for a phone, you need to look at photos taken by the G4/G5, S6/S7, or even Nexus 5X/6P, they are miles ahead.
The first photo is so blown out the sky is blowing out part of the building as well, the second photo has half the sky blown out while the building is severely underexposed, and the third photo has lots of noise and noise reduction leading to little detail. Not trying to be hard on you OP, the angle of the shots is fine, it's just the camera/processing in these 3 samples are horrible.
My G4 was 1.5 years old, and these low light photos are so much better IMO:
Untitled by Geoff Johnson, on Flickr
Untitled by Geoff Johnson, on FlickrAnd just a few to show the detail:
Untitled by Geoff Johnson, on Flickr
Untitled by Geoff Johnson, on Flickr
It's not the flagship though
[doublepost=1461702977][/doublepost]
I'm sorry, but these are horrible quality photos. If you think these are good for a phone, you need to look at photos taken by the G4/G5, S6/S7, or even Nexus 5X/6P, they are miles ahead.
The first photo is so blown out the sky is blowing out part of the building as well, the second photo has half the sky blown out while the building is severely underexposed, and the third photo has lots of noise and noise reduction leading to little detail. Not trying to be hard on you OP, the angle of the shots is fine, it's just the camera/processing in these 3 samples are horrible.
My G4 was 1.5 years old, and these low light photos are so much better IMO:
Untitled by Geoff Johnson, on Flickr
Untitled by Geoff Johnson, on Flickr
And just a few to show the detail:
Untitled by Geoff Johnson, on Flickr
Untitled by Geoff Johnson, on Flickr
Dang. We just got schooled.
He got evidence. iPhone camera isn't that good for 12mp