Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I would call the head line miss leading. The question was which OS do you want. iOS 5 brings some much needed things to iOS that it was sorely lacking. It copies the systems from other OS and brought them in so that one big grip is gone.
While the notifications are not good they are far from being an insult to piss poor.

Put that in the mix and it is a pretty big boost but the head line is miss leading.
 
There was (and still is) a huge mass of people who had never owned or even used a smartphone (with apps and Internet) before. And another mass of people who had only used old BlackBerry-style devices, before Apple came out with the iPhone: capacitive touchscreen, iOS, and all the UI methods and functionality that were never done (or never done well) before the iPhone. Once the iPhone was out, others could copy it, and even a weak, late copy could be SO much better than pre-iPhone devices.

So those masses of people were well served by Android, pushed out by multiple manufacturers and carriers. A “sort of” iPhone with fewer/later apps, a less-polished and easy-to-use interface, poor battery performance, and hardware models made obsolete at breakneck speed as the handset makers fail to offer updates. Yet this was still truly AWESOME compared to pre-iPhone phones. Any one of us would be glad to have an Android phone, even the early ones, if we’d never been iPhone owners to know the difference!

Android has a huge market to tap of people who have never used iOS and don’t know better, or who simply can’t get the iPhone in their area/carrier. With all those companies selling Android devices (that aren’t even compatible with each other), Android’s growth was bound to exceed Apple, especially when limited to AT&T in the US.

But that doesn’t go forever. Android users may eventually try an iPhone, and that’s much more likely to be a one-way street. My Android-fan friends don’t “live” on their Android units the way I live on my iPhone. They don’t make it their computing home, with all their stuff; and that’s OK, because they don’t use their phones for music, and their other “stuff” is mainly online and can be reached from any web browser. Therefore, they give up one Android phone for another often (always looking for the “good one” around the corner). They don’t miss that their old phone is gone with all their stuff and all their settings. Whereas I have awesome apps and games that I use every day, far more than they do and far better experiences. I have dozens of organized folders, Smart Playlists just how I want them, and every setting customized. I’ve made the iPhone my home, and when I get a new iPhone EVERYTHING transfers over. My mobile “home” is preserved, with zero effort. Android cannot offer that.

Then there’s the iPad, running the same OS and apps as iPhone. And the mini-tablet iPod Touch—perfect for “dumbphone” users. Both runaway successes, neither matched even remotely by anything Android. People like their stuff to be compatible, all work the same, and use the same apps with one purchase. iPad and Touch owners are going to prefer iPhone—and those people are many and growing. iPad + iPod + iPhone is all one platform, in a way you simply can’t say about all the Android phone lumped together, much less the Android tablets and music players, if any happen to succeed.

What incentive do I have to switch to Android, lose my “home” and all my stuff, settle for second-best app versions, lose iPad-compatibility, and have poor battery life? None. Very, very few people (yes, some) will switch from iPhone to Android and be happy about it. Especially when you look at real, everyday people—not tech forum-goers who are happy to troubleshoot, and manually manage battery usage, and supply their own security. Yet MANY people who switch from Android to iPhone will be happy. It’s not that some people are better off with Android and some with iPhone—it’s not equal halves. MOST people are better served by iPhone. And some will find that out.

That means Android’s market to claim is some percent of those who have never used an iPhone-style phone before.

But iPhone’s market is those same people PLUS Android users.
 
Last edited:
I wonder if the very satisfied Android number would be higher if they just included the top end phones and removed the lower cheap models. Most of the complaints i know of on Android involve the cheaper models. (resistive screen, slow, buggy, poorly performing apps, etc.)

I wonder how many activations per week if they just included the top-end phones and removed the cheap models? ;)
 
We all know what the public perception is.

Its funny when, due to competitive insecurity, those on the underdog side try to warp public perception to make it seem like they are not only not the underdogs, but rather inversely on top.

"If we just pretend we are the best, and enough of us take that stance, maybe we can make it a reality!"

The funny thing is that since the stats can say whatever folks want them to, I am not sure which side of the mobile-OS-war fence you are referring to as delusional. In my opinion it can be either. I find stats interesting to review, but when it comes down to it I will choose whatever device or OS I prefer, and I hope most folks do the same. In the past my OS mix has been fairly heterogenous, but recently a large portion of it is Apple products because they work well together (must say that's a smart selling strategy). Either way, enjoy your tech and when reading statistics, enjoy the laugh.
 
Surveys are important because they tend to point to meaningful trends; the direction in which the market is headed; possible tipping points in product/service vs. product/service, etc.

For example, you can laugh all you like at the positive Apple surveys. They do bear out reality, however. If your product/service isn't figuring positively in surveys, then chances are it isn't doing well with consumers, which also points to what one can expect of it in the near future. They don't necessarily mean your product/service is good or bad, but they are indicators of trends - of market direction.

You can make up any reality you like. You can perceive reality in any way you like and substitute one for the other to suit your tastes. It's a good thing if you find the current reality rather injurious to your state of mind or if you'd like to influence your own psychology. If all you see is mud, then look up and imagine you see stars. With our thoughts, we make our world, right?

However . . .

Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away.
--Philip K. Dick
 
Last edited:
New iPhones -> shortages -> constrained sales

... even with Apple holding off on introducing a iPhone in June...

Releasing a new iPhone every year keeps the competition (at least) a year behind. But it also means that Apple loses iPhone sales during the model transition. Apple runs the channel dry several weeks before the new models are released, so at some point people who want last year's model may not be able to get one. Or, people who want last year's model at the lower price may hold out for a month or so.

Then, after the new model is released, it takes weeks for production to ramp back up to normal. This causes shortages, Apple can't fulfill demand, and sales are slighly suppressed. (Economists: is that an example of an "opportunity cost"?)

Since there won't be an iPhone model transition in the summer, supply will meet demand, and sales will remain strong. Interesting.
 
Given these statistics, I am even more amazed at the amount of people i know really having to think about buying an iPhone vs a Blackberry. :confused:
 
Take the low end Android phones out of the total sales figures too.... you will see the Android phone aren't nearly as popular either.

Removing the low end Android phones made by ZTE and Huawei would only remove about 1/3 of Android phone sales. That still leaves Android phones selling more than iOS phones.

This is why even Apple's old, outdated 3GS still outsells new Android handsets:

Yes, the $49 3GS counts for a lot of iOS sales. It's low res, but inexpensive. Should this low end iPhone be taken out of sales comparisons too?

People like their stuff to be compatible, all work the same, and use the same apps with one purchase.

That sounds logical, but I actually know a lot of people who own an iPad tablet, but prefer an Android phone.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.