It is my understanding that Cingular will not exist by June. This "new AT&T" will be so great why? It seems that we really know little about the network the iphone will be on, and judging anything on what is now Cingular is futile.
The transition paper touts many upcoming improvements for future customers. Lets hope they are progressive changes that make them a network we (the future subscribers solely for the iPhone) actually are satisfied enough with to join.
Can they improve the service (reception and the like) with the same infrastructure (without new towers)?
Can monkeys fly?
Have you heard of Verizon?M-O-N-O-P-O-L-Y.....gosh, isn't this what started happeneing in the 1800's? these guys are gonna rule everything soon, how's that so good for you?
Have you heard of Verizon?
They cripple their phones' capabilities but their network is big as hellYeah, aren't they the jerks that cripple their phones so you have to buy their crappy ringtones, etc etc etc. Maybe I'm wrong...or not. It's great having a bluetooth capable phone that is only good to wipe your a** with.
UMTS [from Cingular] is only in 63 major US cities thus far. This isn't even mentioning WCDMA, ... I'd guess not even those cities are well covered. Put simply...I don't see nationwide coverage of either data or voice 3G technology in the US for a couple years at least.Cingular (or whatever they're calling themselves today) have a bunch of things coming down the pike. "3G" rollout (HSDPA/HSUPA), new Advanced Wireless Services spectrum, etc... etc... etc... Of course, none of those will have much of an impact on current subscribers without buying a new phone...
B
And old network but that is also why they have good coverage in some areas, more so than T-Mobile or Cingular. Verizon purchased some AWS licenses but analysts claim that they are never in a hurry to deploy then and can financially withstand sitting on them for awhile.They cripple their phones' capabilities but their network is big as hell
This is not a transition, per se; it is only a name change. When Cingular bought AT&T Wireless, two wireless companies became one. This time, Cingular is taking the name of its parent company.Oh dear God ... Cingular put out a similar "transition paper" when they bought and collapsed AT&T Wireless. Can't speak for all of America, but here in Chicago the result was seriously weaker call coverage and customer experience.
...
This is not a transition, per se; it is only a name change. When Cingular bought AT&T Wireless, two wireless companies became one. This time, Cingular is taking the name of its parent company.
M-O-N-O-P-O-L-Y.....gosh, isn't this what started happeneing in the 1800's? these guys are gonna rule everything soon, how's that so good for you?
FWIW, Southwestern Bell Corporation/SBC/[the new ]AT&T owned 60% of Cingular. What this means is that it has always held controlling interest in Cingular. During the period between the SBC purchase of AT&T and [the new ]AT&T's announcement of its purchase of BellSouth, [the new ]AT&T stated that it would sell all of its services (including wireless) under the AT&T banner. AT&T's purchase of BellSouth simplified its plans, it did not enable them....
Cingular was co-owned by new AT&T (which was really the old SBC, which had bought the old AT&T) and BellSouth (which used to be a part of the old AT&T).
...