nathasnajperowa

macrumors member
Original poster
Oct 24, 2016
61
79
Can you please update your results of androbench test from app store.
It measures internal memory speed and performance
I'm interested especially in 256 vs 512 comparison. The reason is Samsung makes 512 memory chip and in their own devices (like Note 9 512gb version) they use ufs type of storage instead of nvme apple use (nvme is faster than ufs).
So curious if in iPhone XS Max 512 is nvme or its put inside?
I really appreciate your help and answer in responding my doubts and questions.
Have to decide between 256 and 512
Thanks
My fault, please use app named Basemark OS II
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: uehithneu

shadow82x

macrumors 6502
Jul 11, 2012
406
145
New Jersey
No worries, results are as followed for 256gb XS Max. Hope a 512GB person can chime in here, interested to know if there are differences.

Overall - 5536
System - 11207
Memory - 4097
Graphics - 12720
Web - 1608
 
  • Like
Reactions: nathasnajperowa
Comment

jlevy73

macrumors member
Oct 6, 2015
86
36
Here are my results with the XS MAX 256gb version:

Overall: 6098
System: 11682
Memory: 4297
Graphics: 15720
Web: 1752
 
  • Like
Reactions: nathasnajperowa
Comment

Vermifuge

macrumors 68000
Mar 7, 2009
1,992
1,492
Xs Max 256

Overall - 6045
System - 11463
Memory - 4357
Graphics - 15509
Web - 1724

Doesn't seem to break out any numbers for storage
 
  • Like
Reactions: nathasnajperowa
Comment

ant the ninja

macrumors 6502
Nov 21, 2012
418
246
64GB XS here
 

Attachments

  • 9ED2D5D1-9784-415B-9EA0-C4A0CC95C8D3.png
    9ED2D5D1-9784-415B-9EA0-C4A0CC95C8D3.png
    2.3 MB · Views: 331
Comment

Lammy

macrumors regular
Oct 27, 2013
179
185
A better option for an app will be Performancetest Mobile. That will give you the actual write speed instead of a number we have no reference for.

My results with an Xs Max 256
 

Attachments

  • EED68B58-EC46-4A9A-9825-E4562E84A526.jpeg
    EED68B58-EC46-4A9A-9825-E4562E84A526.jpeg
    57.3 KB · Views: 398
Comment

mdesantis

macrumors newbie
Apr 25, 2018
13
4
Here are the storage results for my 512 XS using Performance Test Mobile. Once again seems very similar.
 

Attachments

  • 03F6CEC8-0E83-42AC-81E4-9E22B7443AF0.jpeg
    03F6CEC8-0E83-42AC-81E4-9E22B7443AF0.jpeg
    133 KB · Views: 389
  • Like
Reactions: Lammy
Comment

Lammy

macrumors regular
Oct 27, 2013
179
185
I’d like to see the 64gb results. Hopefully someone can help us out because I’m thinking about returning my 256 for a 64.
 
Comment

solodogg

macrumors 6502a
Oct 28, 2011
508
214
Orlando
iPhone Xs 64GB results below, with 24.3GB of 64GB currently used...

Basemark OS II
Overall: 4847
System: 10157
Memory: 2015
Graphics: 15813
Web: 1705
IMG_6446.jpg

PerformanceTest
Disk: 116120
Write: 253MB/Sec
Read: 1605MB/Sec
IMG_6445.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Lammy
Comment

Lammy

macrumors regular
Oct 27, 2013
179
185
So it looks like it’s just the write speeds that are slower on the 64 compared to the other ones.
 
Comment

internetrando

macrumors 6502a
Jun 5, 2018
504
294
Texas
Overall: 6039
System: 11511
Memory: 4427
Graphics: 15046
Web: 1734

iPhone XS Max Gold 512GB | iOS 12.0.1
 

Attachments

  • 2C22972B-D901-45AE-8B8F-58A49036AFF2.png
    2C22972B-D901-45AE-8B8F-58A49036AFF2.png
    2 MB · Views: 185
Comment

eren akil

macrumors newbie
Apr 4, 2020
4
0
Hello friends. i am a new xs max user. itunes application synchronization is very slow. The tests I do with this application are in this case of reading and writing. Reading in the comments on this subject seems to be 1600 mb. I wonder if there is a problem with my phone. can you help me please
 

Attachments

  • D16BB796-24CD-4EF2-B218-DA80DDD2D5E2.png
    D16BB796-24CD-4EF2-B218-DA80DDD2D5E2.png
    274.9 KB · Views: 157
Comment

rui no onna

Contributor
Oct 25, 2013
11,262
7,905
Hello friends. i am a new xs max user. itunes application synchronization is very slow. The tests I do with this application are in this case of reading and writing. Reading in the comments on this subject seems to be 1600 mb. I wonder if there is a problem with my phone. can you help me please
As far as I'm aware, connecting to iTunes via USB is still limited to USB 2.0. That's around 40 MB/s real-world sustained throughput for multi-gigabyte files, much lower for a whole bunch of 5MB or smaller files.
 
Comment

eren akil

macrumors newbie
Apr 4, 2020
4
0
As far as I'm aware, connecting to iTunes via USB is still limited to USB 2.0. That's around 40 MB/s real-world sustained throughput for multi-gigabyte files, much lower for a whole bunch of 5MB or smaller files.
firstly many thanks. but the ipad pro 2 synchronizes 10.5 faster I have tested them all. If you are using xs max, you can test and share the read and write speeds with the program I have specified.
[automerge]1586807098[/automerge]
As far as I'm aware, connecting to iTunes via USB is still limited to USB 2.0. That's around 40 MB/s real-world sustained throughput for multi-gigabyte files, much lower for a whole bunch of 5MB or smaller files.
 
Comment

rui no onna

Contributor
Oct 25, 2013
11,262
7,905
firstly many thanks. but the ipad pro 2 synchronizes 10.5 faster I have tested them all. If you are using xs max, you can test and share the read and write speeds with the program I have specified.
[automerge]1586807098[/automerge]

It doesn't matter even if your XS Max can write at 8000 MB/s. You're always going to be limited by the slowest link in the chain. As for the iPad Pro 10.5 syncing faster, are the data sets the same on iPhone and iPad? In general, my phone tends to have a much bigger iTunes backup compared to my iPads.

That said, PassMark recently updated their app. The previous version, the storage benchmark was too short so it was only hitting the RAM cache hence some uber high numbers.
 
Comment
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.