Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Driving an old banger I may be wrong, but thought modern cars now have this built in?
Not that I am against this at all, just hoping that it doesn't result in a lot of false / duplicated calls to the call centres.
Not new. My 2013 Ford Escape can call 911 using a bluetooth connected cell phone, if it detects a collision. And, no subscription is required.
 
  • Like
Reactions: R4z3r
Cool. Apple hardware is not cheap but they do a nice job of just including services like this that the rest of the industry badly wants you to pay for as monthly service.
I already pay a monthly fee for my iPhone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NMBob
Any cars that your iPhone has a bluetooth connection with, the phone already knows that you're in a car and driving. Apple could use algorithms based on speed and proximity to a road (because, you know, maps?) for anyone that doesn't have CarPlay in their car. Would be advantageous to protect passengers, who, no fault of their own, are riding in an Android owners car. :)

btw - the watch understands exercising - it's one of the core features. :)
 
Sounds like a great feature. Just hope it works better than fall detection. Had to turn that off as it was telling me when I was driving that kept falling. Lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: NMBob
Its not that tricky as the watch / phone would verify with you before ringing the police etc. No response in say 5 seconds and its phones the emergency services - a lot of modern cars do this already and will put you on speaker phone so if you're conscious you can talk to them too....
Yeah but after awhile it gets old telling your watch or phone your good. Fall section is horrible. Driving sets it off constantly for me.
 
So now they will also be able to monitor when you are having rough sex and knock over the night stand?
Only if you were doing it at over 15 MPH. It really isn't too hard to rule out things that aren't while driving, especially when they already have all the roads mapped out.

For everyone worried about false positives from fair rides, rough sex, etc. there are a number of options but they've generally already solved this issue. Have you noticed your phone happily tells you where you parked your car? They clearly knew you were driving a car. Haven't ever had my phone tell me hey, you parked on a ride at Six Flags...

If your phone/watch have a hard impact while driving, then don't move for 60 seconds, it could start alerting that it is going to call and give you another 10-30 seconds to cancel it.

Now, I'd also love to see them add a pothole detection feature. If a high enough percentage of devices hit a bump at the same spot in the road, collect the info, then once a week or so, send an email to the city to ensure they know about it and can send a repair crew...
 
Thanks, but no thanks. If this turns out to be true, I'll do everything in my power to deactivate it or avoid buying a phone with the hardware in it to begin with. Enough with this non-stop monitoring and surveillance. Hang up the phone and drive.
 
"From the report:



Hmm... Is that supposed to make us true believers? Or, suggest good detection?

Note: "suspected". Plus, 50,000 calls vs. 10 million impact. That's 5 out of 1,000.

If Apple automatically calls 911 a whopping 9,950,000 times when it's not needed, then there will be anti-auto calling (no pun intended) legislation passed within no time. That looks like a huge amount of false positives.

Of course, there's much more to this than the data suggest... many impacts are fender-benders or low-speed bumps into poles or walls and don't need 911 calls, and many accidents need calls but don't get them right away.

Also wonder how many of the suspected impacts were outside of the car!

The system may well be far too sensitive. Of course, if it includes the 911 cancel feature that would take care of much of this -- if people remember to turn off the prompt!
Those figures have gone though several rounds of telephone before reaching this article and don't make a lot of sense. I wouldn't take it to mean anything more than that being the dataset they're starting out with.
 
Last edited:
The Apple Watch fall detection is a bit flaky, I've had it "detect" a fall when I've been playing golf.
 
apple is just duplicating what google already offers on its pixel phones.
 
Apple has been using the 911 call data to improve the accuracy of its crash-detection algorithm, since an emergency call associated with a suspected impact gives Apple more confidence that it is indeed a car crash, according to the documents.
In WW2, the US was looking at bullet holes on planes coming back and was re-inforcing the damaged areas, until someone realized the damaged areas on returning planes were actually the parts that didn't need reinforcing — rather, the parts without damage were the critical parts: if a plane was hit there, it never came back, so those areas were always free of damage.

If Apple is focusing on detected events with a 911 call (since they have confirmation it's a 911 event), they're actually focusing on accidents where the occupants are fine enough to call themselves. If they base their algorithm on this, it might actually be ignoring fatal and especially near-fatal accidents, which are specifically the kind this is meant to help — cases in which the occupants can't call 911 themselves.
 
  • Like
Reactions: centauratlas
Only if you were doing it at over 15 MPH. It really isn't too hard to rule out things that aren't while driving, especially when they already have all the roads mapped out.

For everyone worried about false positives from fair rides, rough sex, etc. there are a number of options but they've generally already solved this issue. Have you noticed your phone happily tells you where you parked your car? They clearly knew you were driving a car. Haven't ever had my phone tell me hey, you parked on a ride at Six Flags...

If your phone/watch have a hard impact while driving, then don't move for 60 seconds, it could start alerting that it is going to call and give you another 10-30 seconds to cancel it.

Now, I'd also love to see them add a pothole detection feature. If a high enough percentage of devices hit a bump at the same spot in the road, collect the info, then once a week or so, send an email to the city to ensure they know about it and can send a repair crew...
For your pothole idea - GPS isn't accurate enough :). Also, with how litigious the US is, how long before there's a class action lawsuit by municipalities / states against Apple for all of the time they waste on the nuisance letters Apple would be sending them? :)
 
That's good & dandy....how about fixing the iPhone to watch and vice versa SIRI communication ?, cant seem to get SIRI to tell me the battery status ...anyone else ?
 
I really wish Apple would add a reboot slider in the shut down screen. Based on my personal experience I bet that would get a lot of use.
 
If Apple really wants our phones to analyse what we do and report to the authorities, THIS is a great and positive way to do it! At least this is a useful and materially beneficial feature that could save a lot of lives. Just, please, no scanning our photos, we are not potential criminals that need to be vetted.
 
Only if you were doing it at over 15 MPH.
Surely many accidents occur at 15 mph and slower? A typical example might be someone hitting your rear-end while you are stationary. Could be enough for you to be trapped or otherwise need urgent help.
 
Driving an old banger I may be wrong, but thought modern cars now have this built in?
As others have pointed out, very new cars in Europe all have this, required by law.

In the US, it's not mandatory, but most car manufacturers offer similar features (e.g. it's a part of GM's OnStar service). Sometimes for free, sometimes as an option and sometimes requiring a subscription.

Perhaps a bit off topic, but how does the fall detection work for people skiing and taking a tumble on the hill?
If I remember correctly (based on descriptions of the Watch's fall detection), it first asks you if you need assistance. If you say yes or don't respond within some threshold period of time, then it auto-calls emergency services.

So, if this service works the same way, I would expect your phone (or watch) to present a screen along the lines of ("Collision detected, do you require emergency assistance?"), so you have the option to answer "no" if (for example) it mistakenly activated after you stopped short or if you were in a minor collision with no injuries.
 
Will IOS dial the appropriate number depending on your location? In the UK, 999 (or 112) are used. I'd like to think that a US iPhone would know it was in the UK and choose 999 rather than 911.

Or is it literally US-only? It would be good to know for sure.
 
I suspect it will and I suspect a lot of people will deactivate it as a result.

I think only cars with something like OnStar have this built in, and I believe it's a pay/subscription service. My wife's new Rav 4 came with that package for an extra cost, which we declined.

I have a 2013 mustang and it has this built in via the Microsoft sync system it has. It works as long as the phone is paired via Bluetooth
 
  • Like
Reactions: Canyda and urmaster
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.