Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
You never know when you or someone else might need help. Make sure you have emergency features turned on and know how to use them.
Unless you live in or visit regions where these options are still unavailable (and it seems Apple is in no rush to enable them, because we are obviously not important to them). After all these years, Apple still doesn’t provide basic features like proper language tools for us - no proofreading, no UI in our languages. I’m fine with English, but many older people are not. And here I am, dreaming about advanced features like emergency support.
 
There is no such thing as free.
This will be rolled into the price of airtime whether that be contract or PAYG. All that might happen is the price goes up.

It's rolled into the price of the phone at purchase. Like someone else said, I think the SOS services will stay free, and work even without service. The satellite iMessage stuff might or might not.
 
The only downside is that its going to ruin modern cabin in the woods horror type movies with a slasher and a bunch of teens with no cell phone reception

The-Cabin-in-the-Woods.--008.jpg
About the movie Castaway the running joke was that the one package Tom Hanks didn’t open contained a solar-powered satellite phone…
 
Last edited:
You never know when you or someone else might need help. Make sure you have emergency features turned on and know how to use them.
Good point, on emergency features not limited to satellite. From vague memory...
  • satellite, use the demo to make sure it's funtioning and you know how to use. But it's not a continuous link like cellular. Turn on if-when needed.
  • Enable crash decection and fall detection. It works, though sometimes fall detection gives false postitives.
  • Set up emergency contacts and medical ID in Health
  • Our kids all can track our locations with Find My. Gven satellite is not for continuoius connection while hiking, they can get it if-when we stop and make a connection. Otherwise they can track last known location via cellular.
 
  • Like
Reactions: johnsawyercjs
In some ways, Apple already kinda caved. Messages and Find My via Satellite requires an active cellular plan, which is probably a given for iPhones but not for Apple Watch Ultra 3.
I don't understand this. Why have an iPhone if you're not using it to phone or use cellular? I guess many use it only on Wi-Fi, so I do understand it. That said, it's not up to Apple to provide a free service, that's function of a functioning government.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kengineer
I don't understand this. Why have an iPhone if you're not using it to phone or use cellular? I guess many use it only on Wi-Fi, so I do understand it. That said, it's not up to Apple to provide a free service, that's function of a functioning government.

We use iPhones all over the hospital, that I work at, on wi-fi only. They don't leave the facility and Vocera is used for all communication.
 
I doubt that will ever happen. The amount of positive PR that’s generated by stories like this far outweighs Apple’s cost to provide the service to its users.

The last thing Apple wants in a scenario similar to this is a story that says, “Someone stranded on a mountain died. They had an iPhone, but it appears that they chose not to pay Apple the required monthly fee for satellite connectivity.”
Replace Apple with garmin. I do not believe garmin is free. Or onstar, which has been noted is a subscription service.
 
I highly recommend the 1941 novel "Storm" by George R Stewart. Set in the dawn of modern meteorology, and before the advent of jet air travel, it is about a nascent storm in the Pacific that hits almost exactly the area where the avalanche occurred. This book is in your library for sure, you won't regret it. Meanwhile, skiers, I have seen an avalanche come swooping and crashing down a steep slope, then skiied over the snowy rubble below after it cemented into rock-hard ten-foot-tall snowy rubble, complete with fairly large tree-trunks sticking out of it. If you're going to ski in the back country, be sure to carry your satellite phone with helicopter attachment🍸🙀
 
There’s a reason why cellphones even ones that’s reported lost and stolen or doesn’t have an active sim can still call 9-1-1. For safety. I feel like all phones should be forced to have this on for free for emergencies.
It costs money to make this "happen". And it is very likely partially included in the cost of the device. So kind of like GPS. You pay for a device that can connect to those satellites that generally don't have ongoing costs. But the communication is different with text and or calls. Verses just knowing where you are located only. So I am "mixed" about not charging for this feature, vs it being standard for at least emergencies. Like would you take an out of service phone skiing? Probably not. So, why expect that the emergency services should still work, when you clearly didn't bring an inservice phone for at least cell service phone. At least, that's how I feel about it.

While at the same time. I think for emergencies, it should be free for that time. So there should be a service for continuous use/ability to call/text over Satellites. In those remote areas, whether or not your in an emergency. You just know you're going to a place where cell service is limited. You should pay for that.
While having it work for free in emergencies. Say you "find" a phone that supports SOS. Its not yours, but your in an emergency. If it can work, then yes it should and be free.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: NetMage
It costs money to make this "happen". And it is very likely partially included in the cost of the device. So kind of like GPS. You pay for a device that can connect to those satellites that generally don't have ongoing costs. But the communication is different with text and or calls. Verses just knowing where you are located only. So I am "mixed" about not charging for this feature, vs it being standard for at least emergencies. Like would you take an out of service phone skiing? Probably not. So, why expect that the emergency services should still work, when you clearly didn't bring an inservice phone for at least cell service phone. At least, that's how I feel about it.

While at the same time. I think for emergencies, it should be free for that time. So there should be a service for continuous use/ability to call/text over Satellites. In those remote areas, whether or not your in an emergency. You just know you're going to a place where cell service is limited. You should pay for that.
While having it work for free in emergencies. Say you "find" a phone that supports SOS. Its not yours, but your in an emergency. If it can work, then yes it should and be free.
I think one has to be prepared, whatever that looks like to you. Garmin users have to pay for sat communications while apple gives away it’s sos.

In the unlikely event you are in an emergency situation without cell service and your current phone does not support sat-nav and you find a locked iphone - should you be allowed to make an emergency phone call?

If the answer is yes, I can image the ruckus that will ensue with iPhones separated from their owners.

Right now this service is free, and maybe not as robust as garmin, but it’s free. 911 in the US is regulated but sat comm isn’t. At some point it might become a subscription service like Garmin. I don’t hear a hue and cry to make garmins offerings for free.
 
  • Like
Reactions: djphat2000
I think one has to be prepared, whatever that looks like to you. Garmin users have to pay for sat communications while apple gives away it’s sos.
Absolutely. Especially if one knows they will be doing something where cell service is limited or not available. If you do that a lot or enough. They should have a service.
In the unlikely event you are in an emergency situation without cell service and your current phone does not support sat-nav and you find a locked iphone - should you be allowed to make an emergency phone call?
This is why I'm "mixed" about it. If Apple had officially charged for this feature, whatever the cost. I don't think this conversation is had. I'm to the point where it seems like they will not charge for it, since it's something the telco's will offer. While ensuring that the phone can do it similarly to calling 911 in the US. Even if it's not your phone. At this point, the last thing Apple (or anyone) would want is scenario if say a child needed to make a 911/SAT call, but couldn't since the phone wasn't theirs. While the device was capable of it, and it could save a life.
If the answer is yes, I can image the ruckus that will ensue with iPhones separated from their owners.
True, and there is going to be a both sides to this situation. I don't know if this system has been abused as much as it has benefited. I want to believe it hasn't been abused, since we don't hear about that. And the benefits are life and death in many cases.
Right now this service is free, and maybe not as robust as garmin, but it’s free. 911 in the US is regulated but sat comm isn’t. At some point it might become a subscription service like Garmin. I don’t hear a hue and cry to make garmins offerings for free.
Maybe this was a bit of future proofing/forethought? I would have expected them to specifically charge for this feature by now. Rather than let it be. And they still showcase the benefits, of those lives saved. So, IMO they are going to make it a feature and label it for emergencies. And at some point encourage users pay for it via their telco service for those that would use it more regularly to make calls from areas that have no cell service.
 
In some ways, Apple already kinda caved. Messages and Find My via Satellite requires an active cellular plan, which is probably a given for iPhones but not for Apple Watch Ultra 3.
But not for Emergency SOS, even for text. Just like phone 911 calling.
 
It's rolled into the price of the phone at purchase. Like someone else said, I think the SOS services will stay free, and work even without service. The satellite iMessage stuff might or might not.
Yes, but it's never free. If they have to increase iPhone/iCloud prices to compensate for future SOS costs they will.
 
Yes, but it's never free. If they have to increase iPhone/iCloud prices to compensate for future SOS costs they will.

The price of the phone can't be controlled by the end user, but you don't have to subscribe iCloud. I don't.

My only point was that I don't expect it to ever be a reoccurring charge.
 
Last edited:
The only downside is that its going to ruin modern cabin in the woods horror type movies with a slasher and a bunch of teens with no cell phone reception

The-Cabin-in-the-Woods.--008.jpg
But there will be only 1 phone (convenience of the plot), they all still split up, the one with the phone plays candy crush until its dead, and they still all decide to hang around the modern cabin to be targets (because no movie if they didn't).
 
The price of the phone can't be controlled by the end user, but you don't have to subscribe iCloud. I don't.

My only point was that I don't expect it to ever be a reoccurring charge.
I get that. My point is, it doesn't need to be a recurring charge.
All Apple have to do is estimate, (this figure could I supose be way off), how much the service/hardware might cost them and spread that cost over X number of handsets.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WarmWinterHat
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.