iPhone's have no aptx support?

UBS28

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Oct 2, 2012
1,281
483
Apple has got more money than the US government, so you'd think they could afford some aptx licenses for their iPhones?
 
  • Like
Reactions: atikalz

UBS28

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Oct 2, 2012
1,281
483
It's dead on arrival because AAC is lower quality than APTX and APTX HD is already here which is even a better version of APTX.

Apple can add APTX (and APTX HD later) next to AAC on their $1000+ iPhone's. You know they can easily afford the licensing fees with the big profit margins that we pay.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: atikalz

dmylrea

macrumors 68030
Sep 27, 2005
2,932
3,643
Apple are pushing AAC support over SBC & APTX. It's one of the purposes of the W1 chip.
It was my understanding that aptX is a higher quality way of transmitting music over bluetooth. AAC is a type of music compression, and not really related to wireless or BT, no more than MP3 is (which AAC is competing against).

Isn't comparing AAC to aptX something of an Apples and Oranges comparison?

FWIW. I agree with UBS28...it would be great if Apple could throw in aptX support for those of us that that don't want to buy a W1 chip-enabled device FROM Apple. It's a great standard, can be lossless, HD, etc. Why not?

I should add, too, that aptX has been out much longer than Apple has had the W1 chip, yet no iPhone has ever supported it.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: timeconsumer

Marshall73

macrumors 68000
Apr 20, 2015
1,671
1,421
It was my understanding that aptX is a higher quality way of transmitting music over bluetooth. AAC is a type of music compression, and not really related to wireless or BT, no more than MP3 is (which AAC is competing against).

Isn't comparing AAC to aptX something of an Apples and Oranges comparison?

FWIW. I agree with UBS28...it would be great if Apple could throw in aptX support for those of us that that don't want to buy a W1 chip-enabled device FROM Apple. It's a great standard, can be lossless, HD, etc. Why not?

I should add, too, that aptX has been out much longer than Apple has had the W1 chip, yet no iPhone has ever supported it.
APTX is just another form of compression of comparable quality to AAC both of which are far better than SBC. APTX and APTX HD require the use of a qualcom SoC in the iPhone and the way their current relationship is going that would be an unlikely step for Apple to take.
 
  • Like
Reactions: racerhomie

TheRealAlex

macrumors 68020
Sep 2, 2015
2,171
1,223
Apple has got more money than the US government, so you'd think they could afford some aptx licenses for their iPhones?
Apple didn't get all that Money by paying for Licenses.
Besides all the aptX talk is irrelevant now that Bluetooth 5.0 will be in each iPhone alone with the W1 chip.
That being said I love aptX using my Note 5 and Creative Roar 2 Speaker the Quallity is there.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.