Yeah within the next year I can see them completely killing the Classic and replacing it with a touch screen + HDD, or pending on the capacity and price of SSD, killing it completely in favour of the touch.
Maybe two or three years tops... there are still music fans filling up their 80GB Classics with just music and podcasts. Or the DJ that has an iPod as a portable music store.
Or they should just make the Classic flash but keep the same design. like the capacities would be in 32GB and 64GB first, then 96GB and 128GB later on.
I doubt it will be flash, since the Nano and Touch are flash based already. The only thing keeping the Classic in people's eyes are the storage capacity/price/and "classic" feel.
Even if the capacities started out low, they would get killed off since the Touch has a better UI and much more features.
And I don't think it would go 32 > 64 > 96... they have been doubling the capacities starting with 4MB for the longest time (sans the very very early flash cards i.e. 640MB for $250).
Are there any prospects for someone who wants an iPod of around 80 gb or more, but who has no interest in watching video on a tiny screen?
It was disappointing that the Nano went to video.
Any thoughts?
I wish they'd just release a budget iPod based upon the 4th or 5th gen Classics. No more technology was required, just a bit of fine tuning to make the HD more stable and with more Gb, improve battery life, and they could have left it like that.
I think you are right.... there is still a market for users that want 100+GB of music storage and nothing else... then there are those that want 100+GB of video storage and nothing else. The 32GB Touch is a start at catering to those with a lot of media to maintain, but at $500 it's pricey.
I think the only additions to the Classic that are reasonable are a NON scratch prone back and a faster HDD that doesn't draw too much heat and battery drain. Battery life is amazing with the thing already and the capacity is pretty much maxed out unless they stick a 160 in the low end and a 200 (is there a 200GB 1.8") in the high end. Or maybe a 120 in the low and keep the 160 in the high.
Having 160GB of stuff with you in a tiny case can't be beat.
I doubt the Touch will ever go HDD based. I waited for that, but got the Classic since it was much more refined over the last version. The Touch needs speed to run effectively, and the 1.8" drive in the iPod is just WAY TOO SLOW... slower even than the drive in the Air AFAIK.
The Classic will be here for another two or more years, may get updated when there is new hardware to put into it, or some newly refined UI, but that won't come at WWDC... the only thing people are looking for are the 3G iPhone which may be definite, official SDK release (not a BETA) and App Store opening, maybe just maybe a redesigned MacBook so the rumor heads expect, and something else that may blow us away (TABLET as described above, bigger iPod Touch (6" screen) with HDD but won't look ANYTHING like the iPod Touch.
If you want the classic, you can wait and cross your fingers for about a week then buy afterwards regardless. Or you can check the MR buyers guide.