Become a MacRumors Supporter for $25/year with no ads, private forums, and more!

iPod iPod Classic: iFlash Solo's vs Dual's/Quad's

Auggie

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Jan 21, 2017
288
88
I'm trying to determine if there are actual functional differences between iFlash Solo's versus the Dual's/Quad's.

The description states JBOD (Just a Bunch Of Disks) which suggests that only one card can be accessed at any given time; i.e., I cannot have one consolidated library always accessible.

Is this a correct assumption?

I bought a "newer" 2.0.5 160GB Classic to serve as a backup to my recently upgraded 2.0.4 160GB (now 1TB) and am planning to upgrade the battery and capacity on newer model as well. I'm trying to decide between a Solo with a 512GB SDXC card or a Dual SDXC/Quad MicroSDXC.
 

Auggie

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Jan 21, 2017
288
88
That dual sd combines both cards into one. I think the best board is the quad microSD one.

I’ve been trying to contact the company via their online form but it keeps returning back an error and to use a different means to contact them but it doesn’t provide any of those alternative options.
 

Auggie

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Jan 21, 2017
288
88
UPDATE: Finally got a hold of the company via my order confirmation email. The duals and quads will hardware span all attached cards to provide a single concatenated (i.e. combined) storage volume to the iPod; exactly what I was hoping for.
 

usarioclave

macrumors 65816
Sep 26, 2003
1,447
1,506
UPDATE: Finally got a hold of the company via my order confirmation email. The duals and quads will hardware span all attached cards to provide a single concatenated (i.e. combined) storage volume to the iPod; exactly what I was hoping for.

I have my iPods fitted out with duals, but at some storage points the quads are most cost-effective. Just remember that the track limit. I hit it once and tried RockBox, but RockBox's UI was so bad I just got more iPods. I try to keep them around 450GB each. They're mostly filled with concerts (thanks archive.org!).
 

Auggie

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Jan 21, 2017
288
88
I have my iPods fitted out with duals, but at some storage points the quads are most cost-effective. Just remember that the track limit. I hit it once and tried RockBox, but RockBox's UI was so bad I just got more iPods. I try to keep them around 450GB each. They're mostly filled with concerts (thanks archive.org!).

I'm currently way under the 50,000 tracks that appears to be the upper limit: 11,000 tracks using up 140GB. This will equate to roughly 600GB for 50,000 tracks at present average track size.

But I'm in the process of replacing my mostly 128-192 bit-rate tracks with preferably lossless versions, or at least 320 bit, so that's really what's beginning to eat up space on my iPods, iPhone, and iPad.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.