I'm sure that many ipod touch buyers love the iphone but just can't justify the cost. But with apple's price drop on the iphone you can get a refurbished 8gb iphone for $350 vs an 8gb ipod touch for $300. There have been reports of being able to activate an iphone on prepaid so you'd essentially be left with an ipod touch if you don't want a new phone plan.
So for a small difference in price $50 gets you the possibility of having a phone along with your touch in the future if it does ever get unlocked. Wouldn't it be wiser to just get an iphone?
Better comparison: $399 for an 8GB iPhone (I for one would pay a little more for a non-refurb) vs. $399 for a 16GB Touch. If you want it primarily to play video, as I do, the Touch is a no-brainer. No fiddling with phone unlocking/999-99-9999 SSNs to get to half the storage space. Even at your $350 price point, it's $50 more to double the storage to a useable amount.
no, getting unlocked is BIG "if" for most normal users, not to mention its against EULA.
Actually, as both the enthusiast and mainstream press have pointed out, U.S. law is quite clear that unlocking a phone so that you can use it on any carrier's network is entirely legal. As such, it can't violate the EULA unless the EULA is itself contrary to the law. If you mean that unlocking the
iPod functionality in an iPhone without a contract violates the EULA, that's less clear, but it still would *seem* to violate the law - as you'd still be locking hardware to 1 carrier.
As far as "most normal users" are concerned, the kind of people buying iPhones are more-than-likely also the tech-hip kind who will know that you can spoof the SSN, get prepaid, cancel the contract, etc, and end up with a working device.