It may be enough room but I kind of resent the idea of buying something I don't really want just because of Apple's delay. I don't want to find in 2 years that I'm at 900 gigs and have to buy an external that is super slow. I'm surprised that Apple hasn't released any kind of apology or statement regarding the delay.
Apology? It is not their fault. Anyway, an external FW800 HDD is more than fast enough for storing data, and if you don't move GBs of data every hour, than that is more than enough, FW800 is fast enough to play 50 HD movies at the same time, if the HD movies use H.264 and are using the .mkv container or similar.
Therefore, an external HDD will not be super slow, the internal offers 100 MB/s, an external HDD offers from 35 MB/s (USB 2.0) to 70 MB/s (FW800) and if you have a Thunderbolt device, it will be as fast as the internal HDD.
It may be enough room but I kind of resent the idea of buying something I don't really want just because of Apple's delay. I don't want to find in 2 years that I'm at 900 gigs and have to buy an external that is super slow. I'm surprised that Apple hasn't released any kind of apology or statement regarding the delay.
Hey I went for the 2TB iMac (before delays, missed em by a day)
My MBP had 200gb when i bought it, and it filled up after about a year. When it failed they gave me a 250 (applecare, and they had no 200s) and I filled the extra room within a month or two.
For several months I stopped adding new music and media files. ALL my movies on stuck on external storage (which is annoying for laptops).
The point is I am always getting new music, and I need it all to be on my internal (movies, not as much). So I opt for biggest drive. You gotta figure out how fast your data storage increases. If i put system files and apps on the SSD and music on the 1TB HDD, I'd still only get 2-3 years out of it I believe; and then yea I don't wanna be stuck with stacking externals if I can avoid it.