Fair, as said I just don't worry about it. My M1 will likely be obsolete before the SSD fails. When both 13"s were on Big Sur I looked at the swap file usage, while I agree the Apple Silicon Mac's do swap more the difference wasn't night & day.Not an apples to apples comparison. We too have a 2015 MBP and also a 2010 MBA, both of which are still working fine with low free space. But the new ones swap much more aggressively. I now use a 256GB M2 and I don't live in constant fear that the SSD will die in a few years, but I do make sure I leave more than enough free space.
That's what I do as I'm a cross platform user; Video is on spinners, music is on an external SSD with all backed up. The really important data is automatically backed up across multiple systems/platforms via point to point encrypted cloud server.It's a workable amount, unlike the 128GB they offered before 2020. If you're willing to keep on top of offloading more storage intense stuff like photos and videos to an external drive, you'll be fine with 256 for those apps.
Me too, it's a bit of work to keep it from filling up, but at this point 512GB wouldn't be that much different if we're talking device/photo/video backups, it's not difficult to build up hundreds of gigabytes of media if you've got live photos turned on, and dabble in 4K/60/HDR videos. Arguably neither are needed, but it's nice to have your memories sharper/ animated if you can. Outside of that documents don't usually take up a ton of space (again, unless multimedia heavy) and most of the really big apps are 3D games.That's what I do as I'm a cross platform user; Video is on spinners, music is on an external SSD with all backed up. The really important data is automatically backed up across multiple systems/platforms via point to point encrypted cloud server.
What sits on the 256 drives is factor of function, so I can keep the systems lean. Barring when they are retired, then I don't care. They then tend to get filled up with the usual junk or utilised as a media server.
My current media server is an Acer Switch 5, with an imposing i3 processor, a whopping 4GB RAM, monstrous 128GB SSD. It's strapped to 12 TB of video across multiple drives, streams without issue and has sadly suffered 8% battery wear in the last 5 years.
Thing is it's not about the spec, it's about what you can get out of that spec
Q-6
Just learnt over time is far safer to have your media on multiple external drives versus one large internal that's basically unrecoverable in the event of issue arising.Me too, it's a bit of work to keep it from filling up, but at this point 512GB wouldn't be that much different if we're talking device/photo/video backups, it's not difficult to build up hundreds of gigabytes of media if you've got live photos turned on, and dabble in 4K/60/HDR videos. Arguably neither are needed, but it's nice to have your memories sharper/ animated if you can. Outside of that documents don't usually take up a ton of space (again, unless multimedia heavy) and most of the really big apps are 3D games.
That can be moved to external drives either manually each time you backup, or automatically forever if you use tricks with symlink.Don’t forget file space for iPhone/iPad backups. For some moronic reason, Apple forces you to use the main drive.
If that was actually the case Apple would use 512 as the minimum, the real answer is that for the vast majority of people 256GB is more than enough.People will say yes but I don’t think so , 512 should be the minimum
Interesting... how did you manage to upgrade the soldered SSD and RAM? Do you have the right equipment for this?My wife is a non-technical user. When I bought her MacBook Air M1, I upgraded to 16GB and 1TB.
Pretty sure he meant *choosing* 16GB 1TB when buying from Apple.Interesting... how did you manage to upgrade the soldered SSD and RAM? Do you have the right equipment for this?