I doubt that they're a combination of 14nm and 16nm. If they were, everyone would want the iPhone with the 14nm A9. Perhaps all the analysts meant 14nm for the A9 and 16nm for the A9X? A split like that has never happened before, so I find it hard to believe.
Anyway, it might be a while before we find out. I'll wait for the yearly teardown from iFixit and the analysis from Chipworks.