is apple a HARDWARE or SOFTWARE company??

Discussion in 'Apple, Inc and Tech Industry' started by DoFoT9, Sep 3, 2007.

  1. DoFoT9 macrumors P6

    DoFoT9

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2007
    Location:
    Singapore
    #1
    i was always under the impression that apple was a software company. they buy other peoples hardware so that their software can run...

    or am i wrong??
     
  2. zap2 macrumors 604

    zap2

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2005
    Location:
    Washington D.C
    #2
    hardware makes them most of their money...but software is why I(and most people I'd guess) buy from them.


    Because if Apple went to Windows only, I'd drop them. Ubuntu all the way.

    In the end, I'd say the total package makes Apple the great computer company they are.
     
  3. calculus Guest

    calculus

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2005
  4. DoFoT9 thread starter macrumors P6

    DoFoT9

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2007
    Location:
    Singapore
    #4
    hhmm ok thanks for the input :)

    haha ubuntu, nice zapy.

    im not really sure, ive always thought that because of their heavy software production that it would make them a software company. but u kno...things change
     
  5. Sun Baked macrumors G5

    Sun Baked

    Joined:
    May 19, 2002
    #5
    Apple has a huge patent portfolio of both hardware and software.

    Apple still develops systems, cases, and products their way -- which is why their PCs have Apple I/O integrated instead of the same port mix a Dell/HP uses (aka, not quite Centrino because some of the Intel chips are swapped for non-Intel vendors like the FW/ethernet/wireless.)

    If Apple just bough other people's work and slapped their OS and case in the cardboard box, the Centrino label would likely be added for that extra unit discount from Intel.

    ---

    But due to the switch to Intel, Apple has freed up cash and time used to pay for actual CPU/chipset development for other hardware.

    So there is a lot more cash and people to toss at other projects/products these days.

    ---

    If you look at the software side, Apple has been steadily buying companies and making them OS X only for a long time. Like logic/shake/final cut/etc.

    Then there are the iLife/iWork/Filemaker etc. software apps that sell well and have to be developed.

    So they ain't just an OS company either.
     
  6. strider42 macrumors 65816

    strider42

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2002
    #6
    NOthings really changed. Apple has never used entirely stock components, the've tended to design their own motherboards and what not. So they've always been in the hardware design business, its not just pretty cases with stock stuff inside it. That's true today even though they use more standard stuff since the intel switch.

    What apple is, in my opinion, is a hardware company that uses software to drive sales (true in computers, and also true with iTunes, which is mainly a vehicle to drive iPod sales, they make almost nothing on the music itself). If it wasn't for the software, they'd be nowhere. Without the hardware, they wouldn't make any money. But if the question is where do they make their money, its definitely all in the hardware. They have far and away the highest gross margins of any manufacturer (but also more overhead because they design the hardware and software themselves).

    I think its important to understand that apple see's their computers as a whole product, software and hardware. That lockin allows them to make more money, and provide a better user experience. Its a pretty key point that drives a lot of the decisions they make, such as not licensing OS X to other vendors.
     
  7. Much Ado macrumors 68000

    Much Ado

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2006
    Location:
    UK
    #7
    As Apple operate an end-to-end model with all their devices and Macs, i would say that they don't do 'software' and 'hardware' as much as they simply do 'Appleware'. They are an enigma in this industry that is quite difficult to pin down.

    The software drives the hardware sales which drives the profit :)
     
  8. DoFoT9 thread starter macrumors P6

    DoFoT9

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2007
    Location:
    Singapore
    #8
    ok so apple designs the cases, and designs the systems and DECIDES on the components. but they still donot make those actual components. intel does, or whoever.

    this would be true for dell aswell, but dell doesnot make software. therefore dell is a hardware company.

    true ipods and iphones and :apple:TV are hardware. thats a valid point. apple has sort of come across on both markets, that being both hardware and software. it is true that apple would now make a very large profit from their hardware. but if not for the software there wouldnt be any need to be run by the hardware. like i said, apple buys the hardware from other manufacturers. they dont produce it themselves.


    so apple is kinda in their own league??? having the best of both worlds and deciding exactly what they want and who they want it?? i spose that is why they are doing so well even tho they have really high prices for their computer hardware components, aswell as some underpowered/weaker components (e.g. GPU)
     
  9. clevin macrumors G3

    clevin

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2006
    #9
    apple makes no hardwares inside your computer. or mostly.

    It doesn't make mainboard, graphic card, display, sound card, memory, CPU, cables, etc, etc, it juts buy them from others, sometimes insert some design requirements. and assemble them together, put OSX on it.

    no need to mystified the situation, apple isn't picking best hardwares out their. nothing really about "best of both worlds". most of the time, apple's hardwares are not the top of the line stuff. which is expected from apple's model.
     
  10. lord patton macrumors 65816

    lord patton

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2005
    Location:
    Chicago
    #10
    does art imitate life, or vice versa?

    Answer: both
     
  11. shecky Guest

    shecky

    Joined:
    May 24, 2003
    Location:
    Obviously you're not a golfer.
    #11
    Apple is neither a hardware or a software company.

    Apple is an experience company. thats what you are buying, the apple experience.
     
  12. dejo Moderator

    dejo

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2004
    Location:
    The Centennial State
    #12
    Apple sells both hardware and software. Ergo, they are both a hardware and software company.
     
  13. ghall macrumors 68040

    ghall

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2006
    Location:
    Rhode Island
    #13
    I don't understand why Apple has to be one or the other, why can't they just be both, because that's what they are.
     
  14. psychofreak Retired

    psychofreak

    Joined:
    May 16, 2006
    Location:
    London
    #14
    Although I'd call Apple a 'both' company, I'm not too keen on your argument: Microsoft sells hardware and software, but I'd call them a 'Software company that happens to sell hardware' :)
     
  15. MLeepson macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2007
    Location:
    USA
    #15
    Apple does hardware. Hardware to apple means cases and what not. They do industrial design.
     
  16. flopticalcube macrumors G4

    flopticalcube

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2006
    Location:
    In the velcro closure of America's Hat
    #16
    They are a technology company. Any other distinction is pointless these days.
     
  17. Sun Baked macrumors G5

    Sun Baked

    Joined:
    May 19, 2002
    #17
    Apple used to help design and pay for chips during the PowerPC days, the switch to Intel only shifted the cost of some stuff exclusively to Intel.

    Apple is likely still pushing hard for Intel to integrate stuff they need/want into the chipset.

    If Intel doesn't make it, likely they will use someone else's chip.
     
  18. clevin macrumors G3

    clevin

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2006
    #18
    welcome to the real world. use someone else's chip? I would be shocked if apple were to have that much power over intel.
     
  19. Sun Baked macrumors G5

    Sun Baked

    Joined:
    May 19, 2002
    #19
    Yep, nothing wrong with using Broadcom, Atheros, etc. chips if Intel doesn't deliver what they want or need.

    They are not tied to being 100% Centrino compliant, so other vendor chips are not a problem -- since they still use other vendors for chips right now.

    Sort of surprised the Broadcom 10gig ethernet chips haven't shown up yet in the Mac Pros.

    Edit: Of course Apple is also much more likely to want to integrate the tech faster than the Wintel world also -- so we may see Intel try to sway Apple away from their vendors with their integrated lower cost solutions.
     
  20. DoFoT9 thread starter macrumors P6

    DoFoT9

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2007
    Location:
    Singapore
    #20
    the use use of other peoples hardware would save apple time, instead of having to produce them themselves. thats why i think they are a software company. they dont manufacter the products themselves, simply design them and make someone else do it...


    i think all of those 5 statements above are fairly commendable and accurate. true, apple does "design" the hardware so technically that would still fall under them producing the hardware, just not the actual manufactoring part.

    however i am still inclinded to think that because apple doesnt manufacture the hardware themselves, (similar to pretty much every company i spose) they tend to be more software orientated with a big hardware based cover over them.
    compare apple to companies like dell, HP, ASUS and apple is a "hardware company"
    but compare them to microsoft and linux and they are a "software company"
    maybe they really are a "technology company" making use of everything that is avaliable out there to make the most of it.
     
  21. johnmartin78 macrumors regular

    johnmartin78

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2007
    Location:
    Canada
    #21
    They call themselves a software company,but to me they are a hardware company.
     
  22. elppa macrumors 68040

    elppa

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2003
    #22
    Steve answered this at D:All things Digital.

    It's fairly clear in my mind.

    Apple is primarily a software company.
     
  23. psychofreak Retired

    psychofreak

    Joined:
    May 16, 2006
    Location:
    London
    #23
    Are you more excited by a new iLife than a new iPod/Mac?

    I think that the beauty of Apple is shown in their most popular product: they can achieve both the exceptional hardware of the iPod and the exceptional software iTunes. I mean, Creative's Zen Stone really is better value than the Shuffle, but without iTunes, the experience is much worse.
     
  24. elppa macrumors 68040

    elppa

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2003
    #24
    Isn't software the most important part of the Mac?

    Because take the Mac OS X out of the Mac and all you are left with is a generic computer, which could run Vista, Ubuntu, Solaris or one of the many other operating systems available.
     
  25. psychofreak Retired

    psychofreak

    Joined:
    May 16, 2006
    Location:
    London
    #25
    Which would you rather own, running Vista/Ubuntu/Solaris?

    [​IMG]

    And, part of why OSX is so great is that the software is made to suit the hardware, unlike Windows.
     

Share This Page