Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Is camera capture sound effect skeuomorphism?
- Thread starter Virinprew
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Yes, it is. There is no reason for the sound other than familiarity to how cameras used to operate.
Now, why does it matter?
Now, why does it matter?
By definition, yes. There's nothing intrinsically bad about using skeuomorphism in design, though. In some cases it provides for the most intuitive possible user experience. Using it for no reason except to use it or avoiding it for no reason except to avoid it are equally problematic approaches.
False. It also alerts others that a picture is being taken. iPhones sold in Japan make the shutter sound even when the mute switch is used in order to deter voyeurism. In Korea, they even made a law mandating audible shutter sounds. A similar law was proposed in the US in 2009, but it didn't pass.
If they simply wanted any an audible sound, they could have used any other beep or tone.
They chose (and continue to use) that particular sound is BECAUSE it is how cameras used to sound.
That's the point. If you hear a camera shutter, you automatically know someone is taking a picture of something.
Glad we agree, but then I don't understand the reason for the "False." since that's what I had said.
Yes it is. The shutter doesn't make that sound; it's a recording.
Skeuomorphs can be functional or they can be purely decorative. The shutter sound effect does serve a purpose but it's also a skeuomorph because it's an imitation of a feature of another form of camera.
Some photo manufacturers add the camera noise deliberately - for privacy purposes: can't take a photo without a noise being emitted.
It was considered bad practice for UI purposes. In the early days of home computing skeumorphism was used so people could recognize a Calendar in an application, but as people became more computer literate this was seen as bad practice as for one reason - it destroyed the consistency of a UI. Much like what Calendar and AddressBook has done to OSX. Apple have never been able to follow its own OSX UI guidelines while expecting others to do so.
Mind you, Apple was always inconsistent about the look of its UI.
It was considered bad practice for UI purposes. In the early days of home computing skeumorphism was used so people could recognize a Calendar in an application, but as people became more computer literate this was seen as bad practice as for one reason - it destroyed the consistency of a UI. Much like what Calendar and AddressBook has done to OSX. Apple have never been able to follow its own OSX UI guidelines while expecting others to do so.
Mind you, Apple was always inconsistent about the look of its UI.
Always consider the source. Many people find it easier to view the world in simple black-and-white terms without thinking. Few things in reality are all good or all bad. Typically there are good and bad examples of any given thing (one or the other may outnumber the alternative
That said, design's a subjective thing and people are certainly entitled to their opinions.
The is SUPPOSED to sound like an old-timey camera, but I've never heard a camera make the ka-choo-ee sound the iPhone camera makes...
But most people would probably just think the beep was a text message or alert. The camera sound is quite distinct and easily understood by almost anyone.
WELL. I wouldn't have thought of that. Also, I'm torn between whether or not I want my phone to make a noise if its muted, regardless of what I'm doing, and curbing voyeurism.
I really like this. I want to know if a girl snaps my picture while I'm in Korea, China, Japan, or Singapore so I can mosey on over and say, "So, how are yyyoooouuuu doin'?"
Is any non-beep computer alert sound "skeumorphism"? Yes. Yes it is.
Everyone's humping the hell out of that word lately. The concept of skeumorphism isn't inherently bad. It's all about the context and implementation. There's a vast ocean of difference between a tacky stitched leather interface and a subtle camera click.
Everyone's humping the hell out of that word lately. The concept of skeumorphism isn't inherently bad. It's all about the context and implementation. There's a vast ocean of difference between a tacky stitched leather interface and a subtle camera click.
No, it is feedback. You could argue that it mimics the shutter sound and therefore is, but my Nikon beeps.
Now that Apple makes it easier to capture pics from video, what stops someone in Asia from just starting a video capture with the "beep beep" looking one direction or away from someone and then doing allnof their "voyeurism?"
Yes it is, and it is an example of skeuomorphism done well.
It makes sense.
Its not first world problems, it isnt a problem at all, I know kids today like to say skeuomorphism because its a big buzz word at the moment, but it isnt inherently bad.
Apple in particular has used it to excess in recent years, and in some cases it has been to the detriment of functionality. However it isnt always the case, its a question of taste.
My mum for example, would probably appreciate the address book on Mac looking like a real address book, but to us geeks we find it obnoxious and confusing, because we have different expectations to how software works.
It makes sense.
Its not first world problems, it isnt a problem at all, I know kids today like to say skeuomorphism because its a big buzz word at the moment, but it isnt inherently bad.
Apple in particular has used it to excess in recent years, and in some cases it has been to the detriment of functionality. However it isnt always the case, its a question of taste.
My mum for example, would probably appreciate the address book on Mac looking like a real address book, but to us geeks we find it obnoxious and confusing, because we have different expectations to how software works.
Last edited: