Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Toshiba: 1.65 MB/s 4k random read
Samsung:27.2 MB/s 4k random read
Note that that was a QD3 test (3 queue depth), and there's where Samsung drive shine. If you compare just 1 queue depth random read, Toshiba is indeed a little better though no by a lot. When you have bunch of queued random read commands you can see Toshiba is falling behind.

Will the end user notice the differences? Most probably no.
 
Note that that was a QD3 test (3 queue depth), and there's where Samsung drive shine. If you compare just 1 queue depth random read, Toshiba is indeed a little better though no by a lot. When you have bunch of queued random read commands you can see Toshiba is falling behind.

Will the end user notice the differences? Most probably no.

Do you have a link to that QD1 test?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.