Apple needs to keep looking like good guys, and suing the crap out of some guy who writes bootloaders in his basement on weekends isnt going to help them at all.
Yes so tens of thousand of people "illegaly" running OSX software and most of them pirated copies is not a problem for Apple, ok.... I don't think that is Apple's opinion. The more popular OSX becomes, the more it's going to happen.
Can I just say that you are completely missing the point? It doesn't matter whether the code is open source or not, or whether MacOS X is modified or not. The fact is that MacOS X will not run on a computer unless something is used that gets around Apple's DRM preventing MacOS X from running on non-Apple computers.
That is your opinion, since you are not modifying the code of OSX I don't see what you are circumventing, the data on a Snow Leopard installation is not encrypted in any form. Your are merely using open source software to allow use of the software. The only thing you are not respecting is the EULA.
Again just think about all the iPhone jailbreaking sites and software, nothing has happened yet.
this is totally bull**** to me.
It's the same as US EULA, Italian EULA, Germany EULA and so on ...
Your is the typical attempt to justify something that is clearly illegal but you feel safe just because you know that Apple is not going to spend time and money to sue you.
Pearc is something like an amateur's site, without a real shop, and Apple probably already know all about their business.
http://www.clubic.com/article-303304-3-reboursement-microsoft-windows-achat-pc.html a very serious article that explains the issue for all computers and states that the Apple situation is not legally clear and it would require clarification.
From the Apple OSX CLUF posted on that website "POUR UN LOGICIEL APPLE INCLUS DANS UNE ACQUISITION DE MATERIEL, VEUILLEZ RESTITUER L'INTEGRALITE DU PAQUET LOGICIEL/MATERIEL AFIN D'OBTENIR SON REMBOURSEMENT"
Apple clearly state that you can be refunded for the costs of the software included with the hardware if you don't want to keep it, obviously they do not give details (probably following their lawyers information, if you are not sure you better be in a gray zone, leaving it to different interpretation in case you have to go to court).
I am sure Apple do not want to test the European courts and find out if they try to enforce their EULA, they probably know there is a good chance that they will loose. Again this is not the USA system, corrupt by lobbying and big money (at least in the computer industry lol).
Every Apple EULA has the refund clause. It is an essential part, because people without internet access cannot read the EULA before they install the product.
PearC states on their website that IN THEIR OPINION the Apple EULA is illegal under German Law. Whether that is true or not, bypassing technical measures IS illegal throughout the EU.
Apple are, I'm sure, now formulating their case against PearC, using their experience in the Psystar case to do this.
Yes because the court decisions in the US have any validity in European courts at all... Let's see what happens. Remember in Europe you can buy EFIX in many "regular" computer shops, so again I doubt this would be easily available if it was illegal at least in Europe. Consumer protection laws are very strong in Europe, I am sure Apple don't want to test them.