Is Mac OS X 10.4 Tiger officially unsupported now and getting no updates at all? Not even security updates? When will Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard stop being supported?
But in wikipedia it shows that it is unsupported:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mac_OS_X_v10.4
To the left at the bottom it shows "Support Status" and it says unsupported. That's why I was asking to make sure if it's true.
But before it showed Tiger was supported for only security updates now it just says unsupported.
with the release of mac 0s x 10.6 snow leopard,
say good bye all u power PC's!
intel is the future, sadly
"all good things, must come to an end" lol
with the release of mac 0s x 10.6 snow leopard,
say good bye all u power PC's!
intel is the future, sadly
"all good things, must come to an end" lol
Yes... we know. But that has nothing to do with the topic. Tiger ran on Intel Macs.
Well considering leopard is supported i wouldn't be saying that just yet![]()
Well to the first post, many people that have tiger, still run on PowerPC's, and some others run on intel, since both intel and tiger were introduced in 2005, many people that were ex-panther users, switched to tiger in 2005, but however the last time i remembered apple introduce macbook's and imac's with intel core chips in 2006, leaving many panther and tiger users "intel-less"
to the second quote the last time i checked, tigers last update by apple was 10.4.11 which came out in November 2007. almost 1 1/2 years ago! now and days only security updates are available for tiger users.
and i bet that 10.5.8 "leopard" will be one of the last final updates (i think they will still have more, but eventually it will fade.) before the release of snow leopard.![]()
I know but im just saying wait a little longer to say good bye to ppc.
But in wikipedia it shows that it is unsupported:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mac_OS_X_v10.4
To the left at the bottom it shows "Support Status" and it says unsupported. That's why I was asking to make sure if it's true. Before it showed that Tiger is only supported with security updates now it just says unsupported.
Yet another good example of why you can't trust Wikipedia for accuracy.
jW
No. The cited authority may be accurate, but this does not mean that Wikipedia is. Wikipedia is much less reliable than refereed journals. I have seen articles in refereed journals include references that do not support the thesis. Always always always demand primary sources always.You can, just be sure it's cited.
You can, just be sure it's cited.