Is a contender on the Mac in 2009?

Discussion in 'Mac Apps and Mac App Store' started by plasticparadox, Nov 29, 2009.

  1. plasticparadox macrumors 6502

    May 24, 2003
    I'm looking for a bit of advice. I'm looking to either get myself a copy of Office for Mac 2008, or go with Currently I bootcamp into Windows just to run Office 2007. I'm looking for a better alternative.

    The only things that are absolutely essential - I need to maintain perfect compatibility with .doc files that contain a lot of tables and images, and I need to be able to work with Japanese language documents. I've tried Google docs but the spacing in my tables and the font sizes are usually off. Will be like that?

    The last time I tried Openoffice was around the version 1.0 stage. Has it come a long way? I remember dealing with X11 installs and Windows 95 icons/toolbars and if that's how it still is, I'll probably just go the Microsoft route. Has anyone tried Openoffice recently that can let me know how the UI has progressed?

    I've tried Google apps and I'm not sure if I like it for anything more than e-mail previews.
    I have iWork and use Keynote for presentations but I can't get used to Pages for all-purpose word processing.

    But any other suggestions are welcome! Thank you.
  2. Frosties macrumors 6502a


    Jun 12, 2009
    Open Office is great but Microsoft Office still is the deal if you can purchase the home version. For one thing it is still the king when it comes to spelling and grammatic correction.
  3. Santabean2000 macrumors 68000


    Nov 20, 2007
    OpenOffice (in it's current form) is a pig.

    Seriously, I *have* to use OpenOffice on occasion (workplace), and it is appalling. Like, god-aweful. It's a bloated resource hog, that crashes and hangs. And it is completely useless as a converter of .doc files, (anything with graphics, tables etc just won't come through).

    MS Office or iWork will do you a whole world better!
  4. CyberBob859 macrumors 6502


    Jun 13, 2007
    On sale

    Especially when its on sale from Amazon.
  5. steerpikegg macrumors member

    Nov 19, 2007
    You should maybe take a look a NeoOffice ( - I use this regularly and find it pretty robust.

    It's based on OpenOffice and has all the same features, but it's optimised and native to OSX.

    It's free ofc, so there's not much to lose if you don't like it.
  6. xlii macrumors 68000


    Sep 19, 2006
    Millis, Massachusetts
    Do you work for MS? Really, I use version 3.1 and I find it to be great. I've set the default to output .doc. I've used the spreadsheet and powerpoint programs and they work just fine. The cost is $0, so the price is reasonable.

    I have a new mac and an older pc. I recently got a powerpoint presentation from a relative that I tried to play on my 2003 version of powerpoint on the pc. It didn't work... said the file was too new... I needed to download a conversion update from MS. So I did that. The newest conversion update was from 2002 and it didn't allow me to read that powerpoint file. I tried openoffice. Worked like a charm. So go ahead and give your $$$$ to MS and get ripped off when every couple of years they obsolete their own office software to sucker you into $$$buying$$$ their new improved office software for $$$$.
  7. keekl macrumors regular


    Nov 9, 2008
    If the word processing is on the light side Google Docs is another alternative.
  8. angelwatt Moderator emeritus


    Aug 16, 2005
    I get along with OpenOffice very well. I work with Japanese as well. OO no longer uses X11 either, which definitely was a good thing. It's a free download so you should get it and give it a go so you can see for yourself.
  9. zw-gator macrumors 6502a


    Oct 23, 2005
    OOo doesn't even come close to Word.

    In fact, Word is worth the ~$75 you have to pay after using OOo

    Pages too is much better than OOo, but IMO, Word is still in another league.
  10. J&JPolangin macrumors 68030

    Jul 5, 2008
    Thule GL @ the TOW
    ...we use OO on all our stand alone machines in computer training and the last version of MS office I paid for on my own machines was 2000 and now I use OO on all my personal machines as well = it works, its free and its compatible with MS office at my "regular" job - what more could you ask for:D

    M$ gets enough money from other people, not me if I can help it as I like to spend my $$ on other "toys"... and this coming from base where I can get 2003 or 2007 for only $49 USD for the military appreciation versions...
  11. MisterMe macrumors G4


    Jul 17, 2002
    Let us get this straight. Office is a steaming pile. Office-compatibility is a goal, not a fact. From where I sat, the Office 2004 (Mac version), was the most compatible version of the Microsoft productivity suite until the release of Office 2007 (Windows version). Office 2007 was not more compatible, but it introduced new issues that everyone else had to deal with.

    I have nothing against NeoOffice. To the contrary, it saved my bacon when I received a large Word document from a colleague. Something in the document choked Word. NeoOffice handled it with aplomb. I was running MacOS X 10.4. If I had I been running MacOS X 10.5, then I would have used NeoOffice is a Java-based clone of OOo. It has no advantages over binary OOo.

    If you are a serious person doing serious work, then you need Office 2008 or Office 2004. It will not give guarantee compatibility with documents generated using other versions. However, it generally minimizes the need to perform minor formatting edits on documents received from Windows-using colleagues.
  12. roadbloc macrumors G3


    Aug 24, 2009
    I recommend OpenOffice if you wish to spend nothing. It is amazing what them guys at sun have achieved and give out for free.

    If you do have money, I'd sooner use OpenOffice than Office for Mac. Office for Mac in my experience has been unstable, incompatible, buggy and slow. I recommend iWork 09, or maybe use OpenOffice until iWork '10 is released.
  13. miles01110 macrumors Core


    Jul 24, 2006
    The Ivory Tower (I'm not coming down)
    Office 2008 is much better than OpenOffice. While the OO project is nice and one of the flagships of the open source movement, sometimes you just have to go with the real thing.
  14. DKatri macrumors 6502

    Sep 2, 2009
    Birmingham, UK
    I have all 3 (Office, and iWork) and I have to say that for freeware OpenOffice is pretty good, by no means perfect but what can you expect for free.
    I much prefer using pages over word and have yet to really encounter any real compatibility issues. But then again, I only real with text, vary rarely tables and almost never images in .doc files.
  15. djellison macrumors 68020

    Feb 2, 2007
    Pasadena CA
    For the OP - you're going to have to try it - the results in this thread are so very very diverse - some describe it as unusable, some as a perfectly viable alternative to Office.

    Personally - I've found it just too much of a mess to be reliably useful.
  16. plasticparadox thread starter macrumors 6502

    May 24, 2003
    I gave Openoffice a quick test with some of my documents and it has definitely improved but at this point I decided to go with Microsoft. I just need that compatibility and I noticed a few issues with my documents under OO.

    Thank you all for your advice.
  17. harperjones99 macrumors 6502

    Nov 3, 2009
    Open Office is fine for normal use. Don't pay attention to the haters...try it and you will see it works well.

    ETA I see you did...could you say what compatibility issues you mean? I have never had a problem.
  18. maflynn Moderator


    Staff Member

    May 3, 2009
    I use Open Office and I'm pleased with the performance.
  19. dougb256 macrumors member

    Nov 16, 2009
    I use Open Office and find that it suits my needs just fine.
  20. EndlessMac macrumors 6502

    Aug 20, 2009
    If you already have Windows installed and already own Office 2007 in Windows, then you might want to get VMWare Fusion or Parallels instead so you can you run Mac and Windows at the same time. I've been told even with the Mac version of Office there are some compatibility issues so using your Windows Office will avoid any compatibility issues. It just seems kind of wasteful to get Office again if you already own it on your Windows partition. It's up to you though. OpenOffice and NeoOffice work for me but I don't need to interact with Microsoft Office files as much as you apparently do.
  21. namru macrumors newbie

    Dec 4, 2008
    This is a good alternative. I'm using parallels 4 with Windows XP and Office 2007 and never had any crashes or other problems with it. If you already own XP and Office then I'd recommend to try Parallels. Using the coherence mode hides the Windows user interface and for example Word or Excel look like they are run on mac like any other application. You get the startmenu from an icon on the dock. Although they have the Office 2007 theme. I've never tried VMWare but it's probably equally good.
  22. coops macrumors regular

    Sep 10, 2009
    The OP specifically points out his docs have lots of tables and images....

    I have one document in particular with plenty of tables and images - and neither OpenOffice or NeoOffice import/open it properly at all, even bulleted lists are rendered useless.

    So will be using Word 2008 - althouhg will continue experimenting wiht OpenOffice etc...

    But BEWARE if you also have/use macros in Word or Excel then Mac Office 2008 does not support macros at all. Nothing..... if so, you'd be better off as suggested with your Windows Office running thru VMware (which is great, and you demo for a month).

  23. MisterMe macrumors G4


    Jul 17, 2002
    There are compatibility issues among different versions of Office:win. Before Office 2007 added another dimension to Office-compatibility issues, the most compatible version of Office was Office 2004.
  24. Gadfly22 macrumors newbie

    Oct 5, 2009
    Why debate?

    Openoffice is free. Why debate its usefulness when the OP can simply install it at no charge and test it to see if his documents, with their tables and charts and Japanese characters, render correctly?

    If so, it seems worthwhile to use it until some deficiency shows itself. If not, it's time to find an alternative.
  25. wrldwzrd89 macrumors G5


    Jun 6, 2003
    Solon, OH
    I use at home. It works great for my needs, but I think it still has room for improvement. For example, the issues mentioned by prior posters are still present in Oo_O 3.1.1. I'm hoping the worst of these are fixed in the upcoming 3.2.0 release.

Share This Page