No, not sure. I just took a .png file and used quicklook and zoomed in and it looked fine on Tahoe public beta.
No big deal.
I'm aware it's difficult to appreciate if the image doesn't need zooming in in the first place... but if you were to take a rolling screenshot like BigBlur did and end up with a very long image (1,637 by 60,000 pixels in their case - but it doesn't have to be that long - my example image in the first post is 1,920 by 32,766) where you'll be forced to zoom in
A LOT to try to notice the details, all you'll end up seeing will be blurs and smears.
For PNG files, Quick Look appears to set a zoom ceiling that's
WAY LOWER than 1x; and when that ceiling is reached but you continue to zoom in, it will switch to interpolating the image instead of zooming, blurring it out and making it unreadable.
I've found other file types are also blurry when zoomed in with Quick Look, like PDF/GIF/WEBP, but the zoom ceiling in these cases is close to 1x; and while the details will be blurred, it will be mostly readable and less mangled than a PNG image.