Why is that some of you here down the Apple SSD? It's hardly any more expensive than a 3rd party. It's a very fast drive in read and write speeds, believe me, I know. There's also no issue with support in terms of the firmware.
Why is that some of you here down the Apple SSD? It's hardly any more expensive than a 3rd party. It's a very fast drive in read and write speeds, believe me, I know. There's also no issue with support in terms of the firmware.
I second that. It's performed amazingly well for me, plus there is official support from Apple in the case that something goes horribly awry (the sense of security).
Which SSD or HDD is faster in macbook pro? I am thinking whether i should order SSD instead of HDD in my macbook pro. But my computer should work faster/better/have definite advantages. Is SSD worth it?
Why is that some of you here down the Apple SSD? It's hardly any more expensive than a 3rd party. It's a very fast drive in read and write speeds, believe me, I know. There's also no issue with support in terms of the firmware.
If you have around $500 and willing to spend it then I recommend an intel X25-M 160GB as they are currently in the $400 - $500 range and nothing else out there can outperform it overall.
As stated before apple will NOT cover 3rd party drives that fail, however the intel drives have a 3 year manufacturer warranty.
I don't recommend going for the Apple SSD for many reasons:
1) It's more expensive than its worth.
2) Compared to what you can get for the same price its a rip-off.
3) Installing/removing a Hard drive is REAL EASY, don't ever let that turn you away from installing on your own, apple even has documentation on how to do it if you need.
Well, an interesting turn of phrase, but also a wide exaggeration. Intel is still not yet the only SSD-maker on the planet, and their newest SSD's will be excellent, but so are many other SSD's. Most users will notice little difference in real use amongst the recent alternatives, other than those of size and price. What will always be always noticed is the difference between an HDD and a SSD.The only SSD to buy now is the Intel x25-m 34nm (G2). It brutally sodomizes every SSD and HDD in everyday usage and random write benchmarks. And it has not trade-offs or hidden/future problems like other SSDs, you can really buy it with confidence. Comes in 80gb and 160gb sizes. And it's at the same time the best and the best value.
There are four basic pillars to SSD performance that I like to look at: random read, random write, sequential read and sequential write speed. A good SSD must be strong in all four categories, but some are more noticeable than others. Random read and write speed, particularly of small files (e.g. 4KB) are normally what make our desktop hard drives feel so slow. These random operations are everything from file and table updates to search queries and loading applications; they aren't random over the entire space of the disk but they are random enough to bring conventional hard drives to their knees.
Sequential read/write speed is what you encounter when copying large files. How quickly you can move a Blu-ray image around is determined by these values.
And the X25-M G2's true strength: random write performance. Once again, we're faster than the X25-E and nearly 40% faster than the X25-M G1. None of the Indilinx or Samsung drives can touch Intel here.
Crucial's new SSDs are, without doubt, the best performance/cost option at the minute. Benchmarks have them pretty close to the Intels yet they're considerably cheaper.
buy an Intel and live happy.
I went the opposite, purchased a 500GB HDD and am living happy counting the hundreds of dollars I saved over buying a SSD.
I don't think SSD's are worth the cost at all. Unless you are using your computer in a very extreme situation, paying the insanely high prices per GB seems insane to me. But thats just me.