I sometimes wonder if many of you are just sitting there reading off specs (wrongly) and quoting them (wrongly) instead of actually buying these monitors and looking at them. I probably don't need to remind you that is incredibly sad. For the panel junkies - what panel does the professional-use Eizo use? Oh yes, PVA. The truth is that the performance of current PVA and IPS products in real life are broadly comparable. Have a problem with your display? Send it back and make sure it's a problem with the design before bleating about it.
And also, the truth is that for the vast majority of users a TN monitor is perfectly OK if you're not doing critical colour work. How hard this is to understand for some people on this forum I don't understand. Many of us - and I'm sure many of you who so authoritatively quote this stuff- are not professionals in need of colour accuracy (which by the way - Apple monitors also don't deliver unless calibrated).
I use a mix of 30" (Dell, Apple), 24" (Dell, Eizo) and 23" (Apple) monitors usually but I have absolutely no problems sitting in front of a 22" TN for non-colour-critical stuff, general office things and gaming. However, I think a 22" is about the maximum size you can go with a TN monitor before colour shifts become very noticeable as you normally move around the desk.
The Dell E228WFP is a decent example of a 22" TN monitor. It has good colours 'out of the box', a reasonable adjustment to get it looking basically right and is good value for the screen real estate you get. Consider the Samsung 22 inchers too - some of them have a good rep.