Is the new macbook Pro better than iMac?

Discussion in 'iMac' started by asdfasdf32, Feb 25, 2011.

  1. asdfasdf32 macrumors member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2010
    #1
    I've just received my new iMac27 (Quad i7, 2.94GHz, 12GB RAM), but by looking at the new macbook pro which was released yesterday seems like the new macbook Pro could be better if not worse? I dont know that much about computer but with the thunderbolt and introducing Quadcore and all, it sounds like MB pro is now as good as my new iMAC?
    Is this true?

    If so, should i go for a refund and get that? ( i need a big screen, but also the portability..)

    The thing is that I've got my first iMac on the 16th, but it turned out to be faulty, so ive received another one 2 days ago, and returning the old on on next monday. Would i stil be able to apply for a full refund?

    Hope to hear from any of you soon :)
     
  2. miles01110 macrumors Core

    miles01110

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2006
    Location:
    The Ivory Tower (I'm not coming down)
    #2
    If you wanted a laptop you would have bought one in the first place. Unless your iMac is falling short you should just keep it.
     
  3. Tyrion macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2002
    #3
    You should return the iMac. Not because of the MBP, but because there should be an iMac-update sooner rather than later. Don't want to miss out on that Thunderbolt goodness, do you?
     
  4. asdfasdf32 thread starter macrumors member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2010
    #4
    Do you think i can still apply for a full refund tho ? considering ive already got it returned once.
     
  5. mrparis, Feb 25, 2011
    Last edited: Feb 25, 2011

    mrparis macrumors newbie

    mrparis

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2008
    #5
    As far as I'm aware you have 14 days after the replacement arrives. Not from the purchase date. I know that others in the forum have had several replacements which would definitely take them outside the original 14 day return window.

    Anyone else confirm?
     
  6. John T macrumors 68020

    John T

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2006
    Location:
    UK.
  7. TMRaven macrumors 68020

    TMRaven

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2009
    #7
    Get the macbook pro if you absolutely need the portability, but first and foremost, you should be weighing your decision on your needs with screen size vs portability, and not raw power.
     
  8. asdfasdf32 thread starter macrumors member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2010
    #8
    But hows this new MB pros raw power really? is it as good as my iMac?
     
  9. turbineseaplane macrumors 68020

    turbineseaplane

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2008
    #9
    This is the question that I think the OP is getting at.
    Since the iMac has traditionally used a lot of "mobile range parts"....
    Should we infer that a top end 15" MBP is right on par with a recent i7 iMac in terms of pure, raw, power?
     
  10. Tomorrow macrumors 604

    Tomorrow

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2008
    Location:
    Always a day away
    #10
    Why would you buy an iMac if you need portability? :confused:
     
  11. vincenz macrumors 601

    vincenz

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2008
    #11
    The new Mbps are definitely faster. If you're that worried about speed, then just ditch the iMac.
     
  12. asdfasdf32 thread starter macrumors member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2010
    #12
    well until yesterday, imac's raw power was ALOT better than the mb pro. (quad core etc etc...)
    im just having a second thought..
     
  13. TMRaven macrumors 68020

    TMRaven

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2009
    #13
    According to synthetic benchmarks, the two are about the same in terms of processing power, but iMac stills wins out in graphics power.

    Even if the macbookpro were more powerful than the iMac, I was getting at your decision should be weighed more on the features that both offer that aren't raw power-- in this case it's the portability of the macbookpro vs the huge screen of the iMac.
     
  14. mrsir2009 macrumors 604

    mrsir2009

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2009
    Location:
    Melbourne, Australia
    #14
    I've got a Core2Duo MBP 13" and 21.5" i3 iMac, and it makes a great pair if you have the money :)
     
  15. asdfasdf32 thread starter macrumors member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2010
    #15
    its been one of the most difficult decisions i had to make so far lol..
    I dont usually take my laptop around much, but i travel overseas once or twice a year- so thats why i need the portability...
    but i also want a bigger screen to make it easier to work !
    I chose the iMac because the raw power of the previous mb pro wasnt that good for its price, but now its pretty much even or slightly better perhaps- so Im keep having second thoughts- its horrible but i need to make a decision before its too late. but dont know wat to do to be honest!

    Do i need a good reason to get it refund? or can i just do it without much hassle if its within 14 days?
     
  16. asdfasdf32 thread starter macrumors member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2010
    #16
    I was actually really tempted about getting those two basic models but i wanted one 'proper' one, lol
    of course its better to have two but its the money in the end init.. :eek:
     
  17. mrsir2009 macrumors 604

    mrsir2009

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2009
    Location:
    Melbourne, Australia
    #17
    Well I dunno what you plan to do with your iMac, but the baseline iMac is speedy enough for me. My MBP 13" is 1.5 years old, so it can be sluggish at times, but its still a great machine :)
     
  18. Tyrion macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2002
    #18
    Then you should get a 17" MBP. It's the only Mac that's both very powerful and quite portable AND features a large screen.
     
  19. iSayuSay macrumors 68030

    iSayuSay

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2011
    #19
    Yess but top end i7 MBP ($2500) cost more than current top end iMac, and equal to base MacPro without display though

    I think it's outrageous price for a MacBook considering the OP only travelling once or twice a year.

    How about using crappy laptop or MBW just for lite travelling, and after you go home you can turn on your beloved iMac and hug it all day long :p
     
  20. skiltrip macrumors 68030

    Joined:
    May 6, 2010
    Location:
    New York
    #20
    I am in the same boat as you.

    I sold my 2010 13" MBP a few weeks ago. I wanted to get maximum money for it before the news ones came out. Also, I needed more power. I needed a quad. None of the MBPs had quads, and I didn't think they'd make quads standard on all 15" MBPs this time around. I was kinda blindsided by that.

    So at the time, few weeks ago, I bought an iMac i7. I think I'm still able to return mine. But I like it.

    I know I'm probably going to want a laptop again, because I loved my 13" MBP, it just didn't have enough power. So it had to go.

    I know that if the day I sold it the new MBPs came out, I wouldn't have bought the iMac. I would have bought the 2.2GHz 15" MacBook Pro. But it didn't exist at the time.

    But now I really like the iMac. I've quickly gotten used to the 27" screen real estate. I've quickly gotten used to a nice clean desktop (my actual desk) instead of my Laptop, an external monitor, and cables laying everywhere (all the USB, Displayport, Firewire, power) that I'd plug into my laptop each time I'd go to "dock" it.

    So it's definitely a case of being torn. There's also the downside of once again, backing up, wiping the iMac, sending it back. The reinstalling my audio software on the new MBP, configuring everything. Just not something I want to do again after doing it only a week or so ago.

    As tempting as it is, My sane mind is telling me to just hang on to my iMac for now. In a few months time, the newer MBPs will also hit the refurb store. And they'll be a bit cheaper. Sure, I won't get full value back for my iMac should I decide to sell it, but that's life.

    The other factor is honestly, in real world use, the 2.2GHz MBP is not going to outperform my iMac 2.93GHz. They will probably fall right around equal for audio use in Pro Tools (my main reason for my computer). So going thru all that work for no performance bump, but only for mobile ability doesn't make a ton of sense. Unless portability was make or break for me. And at the moment, it's not.

    It's not an easy spot for us recent buyers of the top tier iMac. Until only days ago, we had a beast of a machine that cut into the Mac Pro Geekbench scores. And it felt good. Now we instantly have to deal with these less expensive MBPs outperforming our big old iMacs.

    The way I see it, if I wait till 2012. We'll have Ivy Bridge. If you think the MBPs are smoking now, just wait still the next update (which honestly could be at the end of 2011). At that point I'll re-assess if I still need/want a laptop and if giving up my iMac seems worth it. If not, I'll be able to pick up a refurb early 2011 for even cheaper as a second computer.

    Again, not easy, but I can't chase specs. Gotta take my hat out of the ring and just keep loving this 27" inch screen.
     
  21. raps100 macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2011
    #21
    i have the i7 imac with 16 gigs of RAM and i feel that is worth mentioning too.. with then new mac book pros you can only get 8 GIGS in.. and having double the memory makes a massive difference.. i have last years MBP(i7) that i use for traveling, and it was a horrible mistake.. far too under powered when compared to my imac.. now i am selling it and buying a macbook air for travel, and basic tasks.. and just having to wait till i get home to do proper work..
    i was tempted to upgrade to the new MBP.. but i still feel it will be far less than i hope for.. my old MBP already gets super hot, mission top plug into externals.. not enough ports.. etc etc.. so for me.. selling it and getting a macbook air seems like the correct way to do it seeing as when i travel I need to just back up photos and footage more than anything and do proper work only once home on the beast that is my imac..
    any comments?
     
  22. CaoCao macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2010
    #22
    The 2011 MBP can take 16GB, it is just really expensive
     
  23. Hellhammer Moderator

    Hellhammer

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2008
    Location:
    Finland
    #23
    2010 iMac can take 32GB, which is even more expensive :p
     
  24. raps100 macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2011
    #24
  25. CaoCao macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2010
    #25

Share This Page