The thing that interests me most about the 2.4 GHz version is the larger screen. Or can you get a chearper MacBook with the larger screen but lower processor speed?
The thing that interests me most about the 2.4 GHz version is the larger screen. Or can you get a chearper MacBook with the larger screen but lower processor speed?
Personally, I bought the 2.4 GHz MacBook because of the backlit keyboard, but the extra $300 for a nearly identically performing machine may not be worth it.
Yes. About .4 GHz worth of difference. Also known as ~400 MHz of difference![]()
I bought the 2.4 model for the inevitable snow leopard utilization of the extra power. There will probably be many programs that come along that I will want the extra oomph for. Now I can provide it. Also, the retail value is higher.
400MHz still matters. It will matter even more once Snow Leo comes out and squeezes out every clock cycle of those extra 400MHz.
I doubt Apple's plans with stripping down the Applications are to use more CPU power. And if 10.6 will run better than 10.5 on a 2.4 I don't see why it shouldn't on a 2.0. We're not talking about Vista>XP.
Umm...the 2.4GHz MacBook doesn't have a larger screen...I think you're talking about the MacBook Pro. But 2.4 is the lowest configuration that comes in.
Yup, this is where i was confused...
I think i will just go for an iMac. Lower price and still high processor speed. I have no real need for a laptop and desktop would be better for gaming etc...