Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
In Snow Leopard, whenever I typed in a word, e.g SuperDuper, it would find it, but in Mountain Lion, it doesn't, why?

https://www.dropbox.com/s/k9jf2wd9get76z5/Screen Shot 2013-04-27 at 10.06.11 AM.png
First, begin your search in Macintosh HD, or select "This Mac" rather than "All My Files". If it's not finding things you know are there, try re-indexing your drive:
If that fails to index, enter the following command in Terminal:
sudo mdutil -i on "/Volumes/your drive name"​
 
First, begin your search in Macintosh HD, or select "This Mac" rather than "All My Files". If it's not finding things you know are there, try re-indexing your drive:
If that fails to index, enter the following command in Terminal:
sudo mdutil -i on "/Volumes/your drive name"​

Thank you GGJstudios , but it still doesn't work:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/mhnkgik39e9pw42/Screen Shot 2013-04-27 at 3.20.24 PM.png

I reindexed the Mac HD as the instructions said, and I have Keka installed, but notice Finder doesn't find Keka at all!? What could be wrong? :(
 
Last edited:
For anything short of forensic level cloning, CCC clones work perfectly fine and don't require rebooting. That makes it far more usable for regular backup purposes, and will more than satisfy all but a very few users.

No it doesn't work perfectly fine or even anywhere close to fine. I've had bad experiences with CCC myself, especially with cloning because it can't perform cloning. Wouldn't recommend it to anyone. As a cloning tool it's rather worthless in my opinion. When there's a built-in tool that does the trick a heck of a lot better and for FREE, one should use it. It's obvious who's is paying the food on your table.
 
No it doesn't work perfectly fine or even anywhere close to fine. I've had bad experiences with CCC myself, especially with cloning because it can't perform cloning. Wouldn't recommend it to anyone. As a cloning tool it's rather worthless in my opinion.
You're very much in the minority and your problems are very likely unique to you and related to other factors. Like many, many users who have posted here over the years, I've used CCC successfully on many computers and many drives over the past 5 years. It has never failed to be completely reliable.
When there's a built-in tool that does the trick a heck of a lot better and for FREE, one should use it.
No, it doesn't do it better, as Disk Utility requires rebooting before it can clone, and doesn't provide incremental backups like CCC. People should use what works for them. If you prefer Disk Utility, then by all means use it. But your opinion doesn't change the fact that CCC is an extremely reliable backup tool with a great reputation, used by a great number of Mac users for many years.
It's obvious who's is paying the food on your table.
LOL! That would be me, of course. You're implying that I'm getting paid to recommend a reliable free app that is endorsed by countless members of this forum? That's hilarious! I recommend dozens of apps that I find to be dependable, and I don't get paid a penny by any developer. My recommendations are not purely my opinion, but also based on 5 years of reading and responding to other users' reports, as well as hands-on experience, and the experience of other Mac users I support.
 
Last edited:
"I've had bad experiences with CCC myself, especially with cloning because it can't perform cloning."

CCC makes perfectly usable cloned backups (from which I've done full "clone-back" restores a few times).

Don't know why it won't work for you.
It works for many, many others.
 
Last edited:
No it doesn't work perfectly fine or even anywhere close to fine. I've had bad experiences with CCC myself, especially with cloning because it can't perform cloning. Wouldn't recommend it to anyone. As a cloning tool it's rather worthless in my opinion. When there's a built-in tool that does the trick a heck of a lot better and for FREE, one should use it. It's obvious who's is paying the food on your table.

How exactly do you create an USB hard drive bootable image backup using Mountain Lion tools alone?
 
...Anyone know if it's possible to run CCC on Mountail Lion using the FREEWARE version?

You can still use the free 3.4.7 version with ML and it is fully functional, it just has not been tested by the developer. Read this post from the dev. for more info.
Since 3.4.7 is not being maintained, if you don't want to pay for backup software, I suggest you look for another free backup utility that is being maintained as you never know when an OS change will make CCC 3.4.7 stop working. CCC 3.4.7 could work for years on future OS X upgrades or it could break with the next OS X patch, you never know.
 
I'm using 10.8.3 on a 2012 Mac Mini.

I previously have used every other iteration of OS X (from 10.3.2 on up).

I downloaded CCC 3.4.7 from the bombich.com page to see if it will run with 10.8 (Mountain Lion).

It does.

However -- when you first launch CCC you will see a dialogue that states:
"This version of CCC has not been qualified to run on Mountain Lion"

When you click OK, you will be taken to the bombich.com download page where version 3.5.2 is avaialable.

However -- if you close this web page window, you will see CCC 3.4.7 behind it, launched and ready to go.

It works for general cloning and backup.

However -- it cannot create a recovery partition (3.5.2 can). I will argue that once you have created a bootable cloned backup with CCC, you probably won't be needing a "recovery partition", because the CCC backup _is_ a bootable "recovery volume".

My opinion only.
 
Have you considered SuperDuper! instead of a free CCC? Right on their web page they tell you it's free to make as many clones as you want. If you want scheduled clones, incremental cloning, sand-boxing or scripting then you have to pay the $28. But for basic, manual, cloning it's free and it works in Mountain Lion. No, I'm not affiliated in any way with the developer, just a happy customer:)
SuperDuper!
 
Since 3.4.7 is not being maintained, if you don't want to pay for backup software, I suggest you look for another free backup utility that is being maintained as you never know when an OS change will make CCC 3.4.7 stop working. CCC 3.4.7 could work for years on future OS X upgrades or it could break with the next OS X patch, you never know.

Good point, then I would be forced to pay to be able to restore backup!

But I can't use SuperDuper, because I want to backup images onto my external USB hard drive, and SuperDuper don't support it! Their DOC says:

"USB drives cannot be used as a startup drive for PowerPC based Macintoshes, regardless of the program used. On top of that, USB drives have a large number of limitations regarding speed and – even if USB 2.0 Hi-Speed rated – can slow down to USB 1.x speeds when used in conjunction with slower devices.
So, if at all possible, please get a FireWire drive!"

With CCC, I can backup onto USB hard drive and boot the USB Hard drive, but in SuperSuper that doesn't seem possible?!
 
Last edited:
...
"USB drives cannot be used as a startup drive for PowerPC based Macintoshes, regardless of the program used. On top of that, USB drives have a large number of limitations regarding speed and – even if USB 2.0 Hi-Speed rated – can slow down to USB 1.x speeds when used in conjunction with slower devices.
So, if at all possible, please get a FireWire drive!"
...
You don't have a PowerPC based Mac, you have an Intel based Mac. The last version of OS X that ran on PowerPC Macs was Leopard (10.5).
 
With CCC, I can backup onto USB hard drive and boot the USB Hard drive, but in SuperSuper that doesn't seem possible?!
That's only for PPC Macs, not Intel Macs. SuperDuper! is FREE to use for manual clones. Download it, install it, make the clone and then boot from the clone yourself to see with your own eyes whether it works.
 
"That is false. 3.4.7 can definitely create a recovery partition."

OK, I stand corrected.
Actually, I never tried to _create_ a "recovery partition", because I see them as all-but useless, at least for my needs.

I wonder just what it is, that renders 3.4.7 "unqualified" ??
 
I wonder just what it is, that renders 3.4.7 "unqualified" ??
It's simply the fact that the developer hasn't tested it against Mountain Lion. It works just as well as with Lion and Snow Leopard, but the developer wanted to continue future development on a paid app basis, rather than continuing to go the shareware route.
 
It's simply the fact that the developer hasn't tested it against Mountain Lion. It works just as well as with Lion and Snow Leopard, but the developer wanted to continue future development on a paid app basis, rather than continuing to go the shareware route.

But can an Mountain Lion OS upgrade make CCC 3.4.7 useless and no longer able to backup, or worse, restore an image? Seeing 3.4.7 is no longer being worked on, could that mean that one day with a future MacOS update/upgrade that CCC 3.4.7 is rendered useless and leaving me no way to retore an image? Then forcing me to buy the paid version?

And is SuperDuper being worked on in case the same thing happens with SuperDuper?
 
But can an Mountain Lion OS upgrade make CCC 3.4.7 useless and no longer able to backup, or worse, restore an image? Seeing 3.4.7 is no longer being worked on, could that mean that one day with a future MacOS update/upgrade that CCC 3.4.7 is rendered useless and leaving me no way to retore an image? Then forcing me to buy the paid version?

And is SuperDuper being worked on in case the same thing happens with SuperDuper?
Yes, it's always possible with any software that a future update to OS X could make an app incompatible. However, you'd always be able to boot from the cloned drive or retrieve files from that drive. Since CCC backups are not in a proprietary format, they would be readable by future versions of OS X.

If a future upgrade to OS X was not compatible with 3.4.7, you'd simply upgrade to a compatible version of CCC, create a new clone, and go from there. Also, if you had problems with an OS X upgrade, you could boot from the CCC clone which was made from the older OS X version to "roll back" to that version.
 
Yes, it's always possible with any software that a future update to OS X could make an app incompatible. However, you'd always be able to boot from the cloned drive or retrieve files from that drive. Since CCC backups are not in a proprietary format, they would be readable by future versions of OS X.

If a future upgrade to OS X was not compatible with 3.4.7, you'd simply upgrade to a compatible version of CCC, create a new clone, and go from there. Also, if you had problems with an OS X upgrade, you could boot from the CCC clone which was made from the older OS X version to "roll back" to that version.

But that would mean I would be forced to have to pay for the upgraded CCC version.:(
 
But that would mean I would be forced to have to pay for the upgraded CCC version.:(
No, you wouldn't be forced to pay for another version in order to access a backup. You don't need any version of CCC in order to access an existing CCC backup. You might need to buy a copy if you want to backup a future version of OS X that CCC 3.4.7 isn't compatible with, but only time will tell if that happens.
 
Guys, if your backups are important to you, surely it's worth the £25 to buy the full new version of the software rather than buggering around with unsupported versions.

If it really has saved your bacon on a number of occasions surely the developer deserves a reward for that rather than just using old unsupported versions of his software.
 
If it really has saved your bacon on a number of occasions surely the developer deserves a reward for that rather than just using old unsupported versions of his software.
I completely agree that the developer deserves a reward for making such great software. I'm discussing the functionality, not the economics.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.