Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I bought my iMac in June 2011, so how long will that be in a few months time err! 4 years! :)

When I go to trade my four year old car in for something new I can't advise the salesmen that as that model wasn't replaced until maybe six months ago it's actually only six months old, or can I?

You have a very bizarre way of looking at things.

Apple still sells 2012 13" non-retina MBPs. If I bought one today, could I call that four years of progress from the previous generation made in 2011?

Speed bumps and real world performance for someone using their computer for mainly office tasks is hardly likely to make much of a difference is it?

Then explain to me what would.
 
I trust that doing this means that you cannot run your virtual machine unless you keep the PVM file and restore it at a later date?

This much is true, though yes I do have a couple of clone copies, one on my NAS and one on an external HDD.

TBH though I wasn't really using it to any degree. I have a Windows 8.1 Laptop with the vast majority of data on the NAS. Therefore anything I wanted to do on the VM I can still do on the quadcore Laptop. I even have a spare 24" monitor, I just need to organise some space.

That is one reason that if I had upgraded to an SSD I would not have gone for the dual drive method. I would have opted to replace the existing drive with the SSD. I would of course had to get the thermal kit from OWC and had also been looking at their own branded drives but know little about them i.e. quality, reliability maker etc.

However, as the iMac is now running so sweet I see little point in carrying out this upgrade for simple office tasks.
 
Last edited:
I think the OP is just a bored teen looking for an argument or trouble.

Well as someone who is nearing retirement that's the nicest thing anyone has said to me in ages. Bored teenager eh! :D
 
Last edited:
Retirement, what's that? They still have that in the UK? :)

Prudent planning. :)

----------

If I was a mod I'd have locked this thread down already.

Well I suppose if you don't like the message and you're not big on democracy and free speech then I get where you are coming from. :rolleyes:

----------

This thread sure is in a rut.

Which takes us full circle I suppose i.e. just like the iMac.

I can only hope and pray that somewhere in Apple Towers Jonathan Ive is starting with a blank piece of paper and coming up with something new and inspiring for the next iMac.

Please though Jonathan, no more meaningless speed bumps, higher resolution screens and go faster stripes. Microsoft Word, Outlook etc. are sharp enough and fast enough right now.
 
Please though Jonathan, no more meaningless speed bumps, higher resolution screens and go faster stripes. Microsoft Word, Outlook etc. are sharp enough and fast enough right now.

12 years of innovation and iWork '09 still runs great on my 700 MHz eMac. I guess that means all new iMac/eMac models released since 2002 are "stuck in a rut" :rolleyes:

If I was a mod I'd have locked this thread down already.

+1.
 
Why change something good?

Well if you look back in history that charge could be laid at thousands of products or cultures if it comes to that. There have been loads of design icons which people at the time said could not be bettered and yet things move on.

When I go into an Apple store year last year, this year, next year one expects to see new things and yet!

When I go into my local Apple store visually (I'm not talking internals here) the present iMac looks pretty much the same from the front as it has done for quite a few years now. The Apple Cinema screen looks pretty much the same, the Mac Mini looks pretty much the same as it did four or five years ago.

The Mac Pro is certainly different - well done Apple, the iPhone has evolved though I simply hate the new form factor and as for Laptops - I never look at those whoever makes them as it's not a form factor that interests me.

I'm also not much interested in iToys, though I do have an ATV plus an iPad.

All in all then for me at least I don't go in much any more as it's a pretty boring experience.

I'm sure if BMW or Audi was doing the same with its vehicle line up then sales figures would be pretty bleak and the designers would be looking for new employment.

Of course I understand people with iMacs rushing to Apple's defence, they've spent a shed load of money and need to justify their outlay.

I too like my iMac but I just thing it's way past time to try a new approach to the form factor.
 
snip

I too like my iMac but I just thing it's way past time to try a new approach to the form factor.

I agree they need to change, however, I don't really care about the form factor as much as I do with them innovating with the internals. Come up with a way to make all systems std SSD and reasonable easy to perform upgrades and stop the iDevice tiered approach to configs and pricing and I'd be happy. Work with NVidia or AMD to build a powerful GPU in the case with new cooling technology, start using standard SSD like M.2 etc.

(Never going to happen but I can dream)

The iMac design is still striking today and I get comments on it every time someone visits.

Cheers,
 
I agree they need to change, however, I don't really care about the form factor as much as I do with them innovating with the internals. Come up with a way to make all systems std SSD and reasonable easy to perform upgrades and stop the iDevice tiered approach to configs and pricing and I'd be happy. Work with NVidia or AMD to build a powerful GPU in the case with new cooling technology, start using standard SSD like M.2 etc.

(Never going to happen but I can dream)

The iMac design is still striking today and I get comments on it every time someone visits.

Cheers,

Ah! well, that's the thing that's going to kill off the iMac for lots of users i.e. the lack of consumer upgradeability. They've already closed off that avenue RAM wise in the 21" version and one wonders just what their next trick is.

I certainly will not be going down the route of slower HDD and non-upgradeable RAM yet I don't really have the room for a 27" model. The options for replacing my existing iMac are looking increasingly bleak I'm afraid.
 
iMac G3: 1998
4 years
iMac G4: 2002
2 years
iMac G5: 2004
3 years
iMac alu (Intel): 2007
2 years
iMac unibody: 2009
3 years
iMac slim unibody: 2012
4years
Today...
 
Last edited:
Once again, 2 years and 5 months. 4 years = the upcoming retina models which we don't know the exact specs for yet.

Haha, this guy! :D :D :D 4 years will always be 4 years of time, no matter when Apple released their last update.

Do you think the competition is standing still just because Apple does not update their devices?

I can't believe some of the people on here. I've been loyal to Apple since 2004 when I got my first Mac - a PowerMac G4. Since then I've had two iMacs, four MacBooks, one Mac Mini, more iPods than I can remember, four iPhones and one iPad. I would never touch a HP/Dell/Acer/whatever with so much as a rubber glove. That said, I can honestly say that the iMac is now to some extent "stuck in a rut". Just because we all love Apple-products does not mean we shouldn't be a bit critical. Some of the people on here have such distorted views.

"Why change something that's already perfect"? If you were in charge, the Porsche 911 would still have had a 231hp 3.2 litre engine and design stuck in the 1980's. Just look at how the 911 has developed for much the better, while still staying true to its roots. That said, it has a design to die for and as much as 620hp in its last top-of-the-line application (old GT2 RS). I'm not saying this example is perfectly applicable, but my point is we should always strive forward, rather than be happy with whats been on the market in some form since 2009.

Where do you want to be by 2020? 2025? An iMac which looks exactly the same as it does today, except possibly a thinner back - maybe completely flat?
 
Nope, the thin ones came out in 2012...

Sorry we're all picking on your one post :)

So they gave it a graceful derrière, phew! Big deal.

As others have said it's been around in basically the same form since 2009, time to move on.
 
I wish you would :)

Hey there, why so rude? I get you've quite recently spent a shed load of money on your iMac and feel protective of your investment.

However, as others have commented you only get product advancement by designers keep pushing the envelope.

What you and some of the other posters seem to want is for the current iMac to be preserved in aspic. Stagnation kills products not pushing the design envelope.

If Apple follow your philosophy there will never be any product advancement.
 
Hey there, why so rude? I get you've quite recently spent a shed load of money on your iMac and feel protective of your investment.

However, as others have commented you only get product advancement by designers keep pushing the envelope.

What you and some of the other posters seem to want is for the current iMac to be preserved in aspic. Stagnation kills products not pushing the design envelope.

If Apple follow your philosophy there will never be any product advancement.

Agreed, as long as we remember not all change is advancement.

If the next iMac is a thin sheet of translucent Mylar crystal polymer that can stick to any surface but there's only 3 versions and if you want to get something a bit more powerful you have to sell it and buy the next version I don't call that progress even if it is really awesome looking.

Cheers,
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.