The Cockney Rebel macrumors 601 Original poster Feb 8, 2026 #1 You actually turn it on by inserting the disk 😀. Reactions: TechRunner and goldmac2006
goldmac2006 macrumors 604 Feb 8, 2026 #2 The Cockney Rebel said: You actually turn it on by inserting the disk 😀. View attachment 2602894View attachment 2602895View attachment 2602896View attachment 2602897View attachment 2602898 Click to expand... 🔥 looks really nice! Elago also makes really nice docks and Apple Watch stands based on retro macs too. I have this one: elago W3 Stand Compatible with Apple Watch Series 11/10/9/8/7/6/5/4/3/2/1/SE3/SE2/SE1 (46mm, 45mm, 44mm, 42mm, 41mm, 40mm, 38mm) elago W3 Stand Compatible with Apple Watch Series 11/10/9/8/7/6/5/4/3/2/1/SE3/SE2/SE1 (46mm, 45mm, 44mm, 42mm, 41mm, 40mm, 38mm) www.amazon.com They have an updated version of it to accommodate the larger and rounder watches like ultras. It transforms your Apple Watch screen into the Macintosh screen. Spigen also makes the iMac g3 version that Elago also has but with hard plastic material. As an Amazon Associate, MacRumors earns a commission from qualifying purchases made through links in this post. Reactions: The Cockney Rebel
The Cockney Rebel said: You actually turn it on by inserting the disk 😀. View attachment 2602894View attachment 2602895View attachment 2602896View attachment 2602897View attachment 2602898 Click to expand... 🔥 looks really nice! Elago also makes really nice docks and Apple Watch stands based on retro macs too. I have this one: elago W3 Stand Compatible with Apple Watch Series 11/10/9/8/7/6/5/4/3/2/1/SE3/SE2/SE1 (46mm, 45mm, 44mm, 42mm, 41mm, 40mm, 38mm) elago W3 Stand Compatible with Apple Watch Series 11/10/9/8/7/6/5/4/3/2/1/SE3/SE2/SE1 (46mm, 45mm, 44mm, 42mm, 41mm, 40mm, 38mm) www.amazon.com They have an updated version of it to accommodate the larger and rounder watches like ultras. It transforms your Apple Watch screen into the Macintosh screen. Spigen also makes the iMac g3 version that Elago also has but with hard plastic material.
TSE macrumors 601 Feb 10, 2026 #3 Do not insult our intelligence. That is no iMac. iMac owners, we have a spy! Reactions: ProTruckDriver, goldmac2006 and The Cockney Rebel
TechRunner macrumors 68030 Feb 10, 2026 #4 The Cockney Rebel said: You actually turn it on by inserting the disk 😀. View attachment 2602894View attachment 2602895View attachment 2602896View attachment 2602897View attachment 2602898 Click to expand... The dot matrix-looking screen is pretty great. Reactions: The Cockney Rebel
The Cockney Rebel said: You actually turn it on by inserting the disk 😀. View attachment 2602894View attachment 2602895View attachment 2602896View attachment 2602897View attachment 2602898 Click to expand... The dot matrix-looking screen is pretty great.
Apple fanboy macrumors Ivy Bridge Feb 10, 2026 #5 The Cockney Rebel said: You actually turn it on by inserting the disk 😀. View attachment 2602894View attachment 2602895View attachment 2602896View attachment 2602897View attachment 2602898 Click to expand... The scary thing is you could squeeze more computing power into that than the original! Reactions: goldmac2006 and The Cockney Rebel
The Cockney Rebel said: You actually turn it on by inserting the disk 😀. View attachment 2602894View attachment 2602895View attachment 2602896View attachment 2602897View attachment 2602898 Click to expand... The scary thing is you could squeeze more computing power into that than the original!
chown33 Moderator Staff member Feb 10, 2026 #6 Apple fanboy said: The scary thing is you could squeeze more computing power into that than the original! Click to expand... Someone should write a 68000 emulator for the Watch, so we can see if it runs 68K code faster than the original 128K Mac. Reactions: poorcody, The Cockney Rebel and goldmac2006
Apple fanboy said: The scary thing is you could squeeze more computing power into that than the original! Click to expand... Someone should write a 68000 emulator for the Watch, so we can see if it runs 68K code faster than the original 128K Mac.
Apple fanboy macrumors Ivy Bridge Feb 10, 2026 #7 chown33 said: Someone should write a 68000 emulator for the Watch, so we can see if it runs 68K code faster than the original 128K Mac. Click to expand... Absolutely! But my eyes are too old to see it on that little screen! Reactions: The Cockney Rebel
chown33 said: Someone should write a 68000 emulator for the Watch, so we can see if it runs 68K code faster than the original 128K Mac. Click to expand... Absolutely! But my eyes are too old to see it on that little screen!
The Cockney Rebel macrumors 601 Original poster Feb 11, 2026 #8 Apple fanboy said: Absolutely! But my eyes are too old to see it on that little screen! Click to expand... Apple would surely design accessibility features 😉. Reactions: goldmac2006 and maflynn
Apple fanboy said: Absolutely! But my eyes are too old to see it on that little screen! Click to expand... Apple would surely design accessibility features 😉.
MysteriousStain macrumors 6502 Feb 11, 2026 #9 When the disc gets stuck, where do you stick the paperclip?
Basic75 macrumors 68030 Feb 11, 2026 #10 chown33 said: Someone should write a 68000 emulator for the Watch, so we can see if it runs 68K code faster than the original 128K Mac. Click to expand... That's not an open question. The PiStorm outperforms every 68K processor, an Apple Watch would do the same.
chown33 said: Someone should write a 68000 emulator for the Watch, so we can see if it runs 68K code faster than the original 128K Mac. Click to expand... That's not an open question. The PiStorm outperforms every 68K processor, an Apple Watch would do the same.
goldmac2006 macrumors 604 Feb 11, 2026 #11 The Cockney Rebel said: Apple would surely design accessibility features 😉. Click to expand... Then you can bold text it. Reactions: The Cockney Rebel
The Cockney Rebel said: Apple would surely design accessibility features 😉. Click to expand... Then you can bold text it.