Move it now?I bought the app last night and downloaded the software for the computer.
But I didn't move the app into a different folder yet to "preserve" it. Is there something I can do to make sure I don't loose the app?
Move it now?I bought the app last night and downloaded the software for the computer.
But I didn't move the app into a different folder yet to "preserve" it. Is there something I can do to make sure I don't loose the app?
Did anyone honestly not see that coming? But to emphasize another comment here, data should be data with one plan, no matter how that data is accessed. Splitting it up into phone data and tethered phone data is just nuts and nothing more than a money maker for the phone companies. I should be able to use my monthly, agreed-to, purchased limit as I see fit and not have to pay extra for the bandwidth I have already purchased.
AT&T can't do that and succeed. It's loophole central. If they could, they would have already. Tether is a long time withstanding product that's been doing this with AT&T connections for a long time. This is just the first time it's been on an iDevice.
With that said, the company's revenue stream is fine as this isn't their first release of Tether, and surely not their last.
From the standpoint of a cell provider, it wouldn't make much sense at all, but from the standpoint of an already profitable cellphone maker, to be able to say, "oh yea, and were going to throw a voice/data plan in with our phones that you'll actually like..."
Droid don't do that...
Seeing Apple take this "value-added" approach with iCloud, I'd bet it'd appeal to them.
No way. If this were to happen, it would be similar to our ISPs seeing us go to pirating websites and turning us over to the RIAA or something.I am worried about ATT looking specifically for tether.com requests and then deduces you must be tethering and bye-bye my unlimited data plan
I am worried about ATT looking specifically for tether.com requests and then deduces you must be tethering and bye-bye my unlimited data plan
We don't accomplish much with our comments here. Write or call your congressperson to let them know what the cell phone companies are doing with tethering. Data is just data, no matter if you access it with your phone or with a laptop tethered to the phone. Comparing with fixed line access is like your ISP letting you plug a computer to your home router, but charging you $20 extra if you also plug a game console or a TV to the home router.
I feel reluctantly ok with them capping the data plans, but not with telling me how to use that data plan and with which devices to use that data plan. Please write your congressperson. Definitely the public interest is there, the way the app was selling like hot cookies.
And yet another example of why Apple can not be trusted. They go back on their word. Company works with Apple, gets approval then Apple changes its mind.
If it is just US stores then it is the carriers requesting the block but world wide it is yet another example why Apple can not be trusted.
That's the spirit. Speak with your wallet. I did this when AT&T made the decision to go tiered data. I know Verizon wound up doing it too, but I stayed when it became more important for one of them to be more dedicated to 4G. Verizon obviously won that decision.Me too. But I am going to go ahead and try it anyways. And if they do take it away, I'll take away my contract from them and get Verizon.
Trust lol Hey, I've got a wacky concept: These companies own these stores and will do with them as they please.Didn't Google do the same thing? Let tethering apps into the store and then ejected them all?
Oh yes it did: http://www.geek.com/articles/mobile/google-starts-blocking-access-to-android-tethering-apps-2011053/
Can't trust anyone it seems.
This was an oversight by some low-level low paid QA tester and that is why it got approved.
I have the app, but can't get the Windows software downloaded. Anyone have the PC software saved somewhere else?
Actually, ten years ago, some ISPs charged for each additional computer on your network accessing the Internet. That was when home Wi-Fi routers were very rare, and the providers would give several IP addresses through the cable modem for an additional fee. Someone needs to sue AT&T and Verizon for this $20/month fee. Theres absolutely no justification for it unless you are on the unlimited plan.
This was an oversight by some low-level low paid QA tester and that is why it got approved.