Montserrat said:crappy privatised trains
Lol
Didn't the Labour govt. renationalise Railtrack a year or two ago? I'm pretty sure it's at least partly state owned.
Moot point though, 'cause they're still crappy!
Montserrat said:crappy privatised trains
Phelark said:Okay, I'm up for a complaint. For all the US people still hanging around here, why haven't we received some of the fruits of this deal with the UK? I mean, still no Warp records, still no Rephlex, very limited FFRR, come on! I can't get these import CDs for cheap around here, and I still want Aphex Twin. Blah.
Jack White said:i just saw wild postings on 4..no mention of iTunes now avialable in the UK.
rog said:Likely Never. Too low income of a population to justify the expense. You could always move to one of 4 countries now if you really want to access the iTMS. That's what I would do.![]()
wowser said:I met an American who thought Luxenberg was in Scotland, and she asked whether they spoke English in London
aldo said:You'd be suprised. Some of the areas of brazil do look like areas of American cities. Apart from large slums next to them -- but I'm sure there is more than 3million 'high income' people in Brazil, which would make it as economical as doing a NZ, Norway or Finland/Sweden store.
On the store front, I'm quite happy but it's been a bad day to launch IMO. It's plauged with 'store is busy' errors and 'this item is unavailable' But it is good to see Apple focusing on the non-US markets.
£ pricing is too high (as always) but much better than the 99p that was touted. Maybe they can get it down to as low as 69p one day.
iLilana said:yet another online music dl service in canada beats apple to the punch.
FURUESHOP Bonfire
actully its part of puretracks but they are now associated with Futureshop (division of bestbuy or some huge american electronics store)
groovebuster said:At first I was a little bit excited, but now I am disappointed!
Who cares for the same catalog, that is already available in the US? The store features almost no german artists, only a few of the more famous ones, but still a lot of them are missing. And even from the artists that are available in the store you sometimes only get one song... Woohoo!
I bet it will be the same for the french people! A lot of productions you never even heard of in the US are in the charts here. As long as the store is not adapting to the "local" needs of the customers, it will never be succesful.
Bad start!
groovebuster
Phelark said:Okay, I'm up for a complaint. For all the US people still hanging around here, why haven't we received some of the fruits of this deal with the UK? I mean, still no Warp records, still no Rephlex, very limited FFRR, come on! I can't get these import CDs for cheap around here, and I still want Aphex Twin. Blah.
NOV said:Yet the Euro itself already has popular "nicknames" but that has much to do with the fact that most people HATE the new currency, because it made our lives 50-100% more expensive.
So in Holland the Euro is often named PLEURO (referring to the disease "pleurisy") en in Germany they name it TEURO (referring to the word "teuer" = "expensive").
So to all British on this board: "Never make the mistake of introducing the Euro in your country!!"
Some of these comments show a lack of how these sorts of agreements work. The artists and music companies in each country will have different demands and this creates a nightmare for companies like Apple! They just CANNOT add artists at their own discretion. So Europeans had a choice... no iTMS for months to come or start now wth an incomplete but (hopefully) growing catalogue. I continue to be amazed at the comments about "bad Apple" for failing to offer the service that everyone would like. For now, they cannot! Get it??iChan said:this is a point i made in another thread... we need stores that are taregetted at the local community, not mirrors of the current store. however, even that has not happened... the UK store pales in comparison to the US one in terms of catalogue...
the best thing apple could have done was mirror the sites, as in, have the exactly same content, plue add local content for the other countries.
According to news reports, Apple started approaching indie labels very late in the game. As a good Mac zealot I will blame Bill Gates for that.rjwill246 said:Some of these comments show a lack of how these sorts of agreements work. The artists and music companies in each country will have different demands and this creates a nightmare for companies like Apple! They just CANNOT add artists at their own discretion. So Europeans had a choice... no iTMS for months to come or start now wth an incomplete but (hopefully) growing catalogue. I continue to be amazed at the comments about "bad Apple" for failing to offer the service that everyone would like. For now, they cannot! Get it??
I disagree. It's not for Apple to say what music you are interested in, based on where you live. It's for you to say. They should offer everyone the same catalog of anything they can license. If they add a U.K. subsection or U.K. defaults on the iTMS home page, or some other easy ways to look for regional music, that's fine, because you choose if and when to use it.iChan said:we need stores that are taregetted at the local community, not mirrors of the current store
Colonel Panik said:if I purchase an item when I'm ordering from Austria, then I pay the Austrian VAT, even if I buy from Germany. However, if I go to Germany and then buy the item, then I just pay the German VAT.
Doctor Q said:It's not for Apple to say what music you are interested in, based on where you live. It's for you to say.
I have done so when I had a complaint or suggestion. But today I have none. I was responding to iChan's suggestion that the store target each local community.mcdermd said:You could always leave them feedback about their catalogue:
http://www.apple.com/feedback/itunes.html
The new special EU directive for electronic services (such as software and music downloads) is different though. Basically, the difference is that the sales limit rule does not apply. See this table. The second option in the table (customer is a "non-entrepeneur") says that VAT is owed in the suppliers member state. In iTMS's case in Luxembourg. There is no mention of a limit in sales, like with physical goods.
Luxembourg Alternatives
Before opting for the traditional regime or the special regime, a US company should determine whether it may be more advantageous to establish a Luxembourg subsidiary through which it would make its B2C sales. The benefits to such an arrangement would be two-fold. First, B2C sales would be subject solely to Luxembourg VAT at a 15% rate, the lowest VAT rate within the EU. Second, the administrative burden would be minimal when compared to the traditional regime and special regime. The benefits would of course, need to be balanced against the related costs which would include, in an arrangement designed to withstand the scrutiny of the VAT authorities of EU member countries: (i) ¤2,500 excluding VAT for professional fees to organize the Luxembourg subsidiary, (ii) a capital tax equal to 1% of the initial capital invested in the subsidiary (which should be minimal), (iii) ¤30,000 estimated annual costs which includes the cost of a resident director, net worth tax, filing of statutory financial statements, preparation of VAT returns, preparation of income tax returns, etc., and (iv) Luxembourg income tax (levied at roughly a 30% rate) on income deemed equal to 10% of the costs incurred by the Luxembourg subsidiary (excluding cost of goods sold and license fees).