Yeah, but how many people have these kind of connections? A vast minority, I would guess.sushi said:Or with FTTH (100Mbps) you can easily DL at 8MB per second.
A 6GB DVD would take about 12.5 minutes.
And considering that most DVD movies are smaller, if you exclude the extras, then it would take even less time.
Sushi
sinisterdesign said:i can't say that i'm very surprised about this. try taking a BMP image>JPEG>BMP>JPEG, etc. everytime the computer has to compress something, it slightly changes the data. when it goes to recompress, the data is slightly different than it was the original, so it has to compress it slightly different and on and on. i don't see why AAC/MPEG audio compression would be any different than JPEG image compression. it's just taking the areas that we really focus on and compressing them less and areas of less detail & compressing them more.
BOOMBA said:they shouldn't, since there hasn't been a good one yet...
Poff said:I might be wrong, but I just don't see how Apple could declare this as the year of HD, and then announce some whimpy little VCD-download service.
And DVD is too early for now.
I have a 1200Kbps line, I guess many people have even less.
A 6GB DVD would take approximately 11 hours 6 minutes and 40 seconds to download at optimal speed, when not using the internet for anything else.
I wouldn't dare to try to download Schindlers List!!
How big would a HD-movie be, btw..?
The maths:
A 1200Kbps line will have a maximum download speed of 1200/8=150KBps.
6 GB = 6 000 000 KB
6''KB / 150KBps = 40 000 seconds
Here in the Tokyo area, it is becoming pretty standard and easy to get vice a couple of years ago.Veldek said:Yeah, but how many people have these kind of connections? A vast minority, I would guess.