Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
iPad Pro It's just a matter of time before FCPX released for iPad version.
- Thread starter sunny5
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Because Final Cut Pro is not needed when you have Davinci Resolve. Apple better focus their efforts on Logic and Xcode.
Because if you want FCPX Apple wants you to buy the more expensive MacBook Pro.
It's been "just a matter of time" for ages now.
I've seen countless threads here and on Reddit over the years about how Apple must surely be poised to release FCP* and other creative apps like Logic Pro. But the iPad Pro has been around since 2015, yet here we all are twiddling our thumbs. Like many, I assumed the 2018 Pros with their huge step forward in performance would mark a new era of iPad apps - but nope.
For reasons known best to themselves, Apple just doesn't seem to be interested in making these kinds of apps. Even the consumer apps like iMovie and GarageBand have barely changed in a decade.
(This is a separate argument, but personally, I don't particularly want Final Cut on the iPad. If I want a traditional NLE, I've got Lumafusion and my Mac. If Apple were to make a big splash with a video app, I'd prefer them to try something bold, new, and paradigm breaking. Something between FCP and iMovie that made extensive use of ML to reimagine what prosumer/enthusiast editing could look like).
*pedantic note - it's not called FCPX anymore: the X was dropped 2 years ago.
I've seen countless threads here and on Reddit over the years about how Apple must surely be poised to release FCP* and other creative apps like Logic Pro. But the iPad Pro has been around since 2015, yet here we all are twiddling our thumbs. Like many, I assumed the 2018 Pros with their huge step forward in performance would mark a new era of iPad apps - but nope.
For reasons known best to themselves, Apple just doesn't seem to be interested in making these kinds of apps. Even the consumer apps like iMovie and GarageBand have barely changed in a decade.
(This is a separate argument, but personally, I don't particularly want Final Cut on the iPad. If I want a traditional NLE, I've got Lumafusion and my Mac. If Apple were to make a big splash with a video app, I'd prefer them to try something bold, new, and paradigm breaking. Something between FCP and iMovie that made extensive use of ML to reimagine what prosumer/enthusiast editing could look like).
*pedantic note - it's not called FCPX anymore: the X was dropped 2 years ago.
If you're editing complex video on an iPad, you probably want a 12.9 Pro with at least one storage upgrade - in which case, you're well into MacBook Pro pricing...even before you've bought a keyboard, trackpad, or other similar accessories.
The counterpoint is that you risk jeopardising relations with your developer community by competing with them directly.
When the iPad first launched, I can see the logic of having a mobile version of iMovie where none existed, to set the bar and to serve as something that users can jump into right away while waiting for developers to release their own variations.
I have no idea how many copies of lumafusion has been sold, or how many people are even using it to edit videos over FCP on their Mac. But now that another big name (Resolve) is set to launch, it doesn't seem like good sport to steal their thunder (and potential sales) by announcing your own equivalent video editing software.
A lot of those in the online tech space/YouTuber community who are demanding Apple's pro apps on the iPad, also wouldn't be seen dead trying to use Apple's pro apps on a MacBook Air.
So I don't really know why they would also demand them on an iPad (which also comes with a fan-less CPU).
Professional applications can be made to work within the limitations of iPad hardware and software, but I think if people are expecting an M1Pro/Max-level pro apps experience on an iPad, they're going to be very disappointed.
So I don't really know why they would also demand them on an iPad (which also comes with a fan-less CPU).
Professional applications can be made to work within the limitations of iPad hardware and software, but I think if people are expecting an M1Pro/Max-level pro apps experience on an iPad, they're going to be very disappointed.
How come you are not thinking that iPad Pro can be used as a side device to support FCPX's workflow? Such a narrow vision.
A strange response. How do you know what I’m thinking?!
I don’t think my “narrow vision” is the problem here. I‘d love to see Apple try something daring and innovative - iPad as a main device, or as a side device, using the Final Cut framework, say a specialised tool to do colour grading (an area in which FCP is clearly behind in now), or doing something completely new and unexpected. Whatever, I’d be excited to try it!
My point was simply that, over a long period of time, Apple has shown no interest in developing new creative apps on the iPad. I’d love to have my pessimism be proved wrong.
Last edited:
My counterargument would be that Apple may not want to be seen as competing directly with the very developers they are trying to court (those interested in bringing pro apps to the iPad). It's time and resources, and they don't quite need the money anyways (iMovie and iWork's are free at this point).
