iPod touch It's not called an iTouch. =(

[shigzeo]

this has been discussed before: many times

somehow the product is still the same now matter what people call it. at this forum it has had several discussions on the same exact topic... getting tired of people getting tired if people calling it an itouch

 

[iDAG]

Add me to the list of people that need to call the thing an iPod touch. It is always the Windows people that say the name wrong!

 

[Eraserhead]

iTouch myself.

Which is why I call it an iTouch .

To be honest calling it an iTouch is like calling Mac OS X Mac oh ess ex. rather than Mac oh ess 10.

 

[andiwm2003]

you mean refer to it as "iNano"
it's just not human.

You can say Touch
just don't say
"iTouch"

that of course has to be the opinion of somebody calling himself iJesus

 

[Silver-Fox]

man get over it, why does it bother you so much

 

[Oofie]

Lol at the people getting bothered by 'itouch'. Fanboys...

 

[br1anc]

i rather call it a Touch but i dont like it when someone says iTouch.

 

[cheeseadiddle]

Which is why I call it an iTouch .

To be honest calling it an iTouch is like calling Mac OS X Mac oh ess ex. rather than Mac oh ess 10.

After owning an iMac and an iPhone for six months... my ol' lady still calls it OS Ex. Even at the Genius Bar. Kinda embarrassing.

 

[Eraserhead]

I still call it oh ess ex, even at the genius bar.

 

[thesdx]

Oh, yet another one of these threads.

 

[elppa]

I still call it oh ess ex, even at the genius bar.

Why? That's wrong.

 

[razorianfly]

For God's sake.

'iPod touch' sells itself. End.

There is no need for the branding to reflect 'touch' in any way.

I could care less about people calling it 'iTouch' 'iPod Touchable' "The touch' 'iPt' 'ipt' '2/3 iPhone' or any other variation which has reered it's head due to lazy language.

Actually looking back, iPod Generation 6 (iPod G6 - or just G6) would of been perfect.

Really, your not telling me the one overriding factor which made you choose to buy iPod touch over say, a nano, was the fact it had 'touch' in the branding? - it wasn't. I'd like to be it was based on hardware capability including storage/touch controls as well as software potential. Yes, the iPod brand has been expanded, but iPod touch is now a different brand to iPod. Just as iPod has acquired different names since it's launch due to abbreviation, iPod touch has too. It's a sign that the branding it strong, as we all know iPod is, it's recognized the world over.

So lets give people who are using these abbreviations a break, Yeah?

.. and maybe start caring about REAL issues, like ... O .. i don't know, Poverty?

Let this be an end to a pathetic excuse people like to call an 'issue'.

R-Fly

 

[cheeseadiddle]

How about 2/3 iPhone?

 

[MacRy]

Most pointless thread ever!

 

[Eraserhead]

Why? That's wrong.

Does it really matter? Tomarto Tomayto and all that.

 

[WinterMute]

Enough already....