...you read about something in the news and the first thing you think of is someone from MacRumors 
Johansson, Knightley Bare All for Magazine
Johansson, Knightley Bare All for Magazine
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
It's sad when... (Vanity Fair cover)
- Thread starter MattG
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Abstract said:Johannson probably looks better naked, mind you.
*dodges bullet in "bullet time"*
I agree... Keira's stomach is just kinda weird looking.
But you can't really tell from that 100*300 pixel image. *shrug*
Hey, I'm a Johanson. I am contractually obligated to like a Johansson over a Knightley.
If only Rachel McAdams hadn't wussed out... then it would ALMOST be perfect. Instead we get to see this Ford guy.
EDIT: Image removed. If someone else wants to host it, let me know.
If only Rachel McAdams hadn't wussed out... then it would ALMOST be perfect. Instead we get to see this Ford guy.
EDIT: Image removed. If someone else wants to host it, let me know.
clayj said:If you want to see a big scan of the picture/cover in question, click here.
Hey, I'm a Johanson. I am contractually obligated to like a Johansson over a Knightley.
If only Rachel McAdams hadn't wussed out... then it would ALMOST be perfect. Instead we get to see this Ford guy.
yay for sending us to a page that makes us register to the forum...
A week or so ago, I got a shock when I spotted Munkle's tar on the front page of the BBC website...
...was even more shocked when I discovered that it was actually a story about monkeys but for a moment, I wondered what site I was on!
...was even more shocked when I discovered that it was actually a story about monkeys but for a moment, I wondered what site I was on!
I saw the Vanity Fair cover and immediately thought of MR and that KK thread with around a billion posts from back in the day.
I think that link should come with a "heavy breathing in here" warning. I wish i was the bloke in the photo, how much did he see??
katie ta achoo said:
It is called being fit. Those are muscles, similar to a six pack that guys can get. The way she is sitting makes them fold weirdly though.
Personally I prefer someone with a little skin tone, not bright white.
TEG
barneygumble said:I think that link should come with a "heavy breathing in here" warning. I wish i was the bloke in the photo, how much did he see??
all of them goodies.
but that johansson chick looked too pale in that pic. and what's with that dark colored nail color thing (another minus point for the johansson chick).
mopppish said:Holy...freaking...GOD!
I've been getting the impression lately that these are the kind of girls you can't bring home to mum.
But... so... HOT.
if i could bring home at least one of them home? who cares about mom?
clayj said:Hey, I'm a Johanson. I am contractually obligated to like a Johansson over a Knightley.
Umm... I'm not sure I agree with that mentality...
It's illegal in Australia.
RE: It's sad when...
I saw that on yahoo, and yes, I fall under that category too
MattG said:...you read about something in the news and the first thing you think of is someone from MacRumors
Johansson, Knightley Bare All for Magazine
I saw that on yahoo, and yes, I fall under that category too
Actually the first thing I thought of ws "why is that dude ruining a perfectly good magazine cover" then it went right to threads and avatars over here...
You guys must really be smoking something. Keira is in significantly better physical condition. And is more attractive.Abstract said:Johannson probably looks better naked, mind you.
(And, through some miracle of either modern photography or Photoshop, actually appears to have a chest larger than that of a 12-year-old boy.)
BTW, I'm not just saying that to get on the e's good side.
I'm pretty gosh darned sure that none of these were due to personal choice...redAPPLE said:
And clay, I agree, Rachel McAdams is way way way hotter than either of these two and should have been in there! Oh well, we've all got our limits, right?
You can be fit without a six pack. Women can have six packs, too. You can have a six pack and still be unhealthy. As in, unhealthy heart strain, etc. etc.TEG said:
I was about to post a new thread on this, but I'm glad to announce that I passed the noob test and found this thread by searching for 'Vanity Fair'.
Count me in as one of those whose primary association with this picture was macrumors and one of our dear moderators.
Count me in as one of those whose primary association with this picture was macrumors and one of our dear moderators.
Why do people argue about which superstar is hotter than some other superstar? Obviously, these are all very attractive people, and different people are attracted to different things (and thank goodness for that).