wordmunger said:
Why do we think libraries are "good" but downloading music is "bad"? Think about it. Checking out a book from the library has more in common with downloading music from the 'Net than robbing someone on the street does.
You bring up libraries. We all contribute money (via taxes, donations, etc) to make libraries possible. When we "borrow" information, be it music, writings, or videos, we are using them in a legal and responsible manner.
However, it does become a more gray issue. What if I photocopy a magazine article to bring home and keep? Is this a crime? Is it morally wrong?
Now, take that to the next level. Many of my iTunes songs are from CDs from the public library. Is that stealing? Clearly, if I was to burn copies and sell them that would be morally wrong. However, having them on my computer (and iPod), and listening to them is a more gray issue. Is it different than an extending "check-out" from the library? Is it different than ripping one of my friend's CDs for my personal usage?
I think, overall, it is probably wrong. Most of the music I listen to is jazz, by dead artists, so I'm not really hurting them financially. However, that isn't a good argument.
It just doesn't seem as wrong as downloading music from P2P sites. I can check out the music and listen to it for 2 weeks... that is no problem. However, if I copy it to listen to indefinately, this is wrong, right?
What do you guys think? Is ripping from the public library stealing? Is it any different than recording a show on TIVO, buring it to a DVD, and adding it to my collection? VCR recordings of TV / HBO for personal usage don't seem like a big problem. Why is this so different?
-alywa