There are limitations, of course. But I'd say giving SO MUCH MONEY - and even more money - to itunes for my music is quite a major limitation, wouldn't you?
Who's putting a gun to your head and making you give them "SO MUCH MONEY"? Buy a little or buy a lot, nobody is forcing anything.
And with a monthly subscription, how much music do you have to listen to when you stop paying? Sure looks like
zero to me. Any music I buy I have available for the rest of my life assuming I still want it.
The fact is that the subscription model has been tried for years, and for years iTunes has cleaned its clock.
Wi-fi and battery life are improving rapidly.
Enough that a player that is connected constantly will be able to compete with the 15-25 hours of current iPods within ONE YEAR? Do you seriously think that is likely considering how "rapidly" batteries have improved?
And all those people with ipods, well don't they have phones? Don't they upgrade them every few years. Will they say no to streaming music?
Yep,
every few years. Your math is off if you think people upgrading phones every few years is enough to dethrone iTunes in ONE year. And whether they say no to streaming music depends on all the factors I listed.
And true, when you stop subscribing you'll have no music. But when are you going to stop buying music?
The amount I spend on music is less than a monthly subscription. So no, a subscription doesn't interest me, and yes, it seems like way too much cost for way too little. The fact that no music subscription model has done particularly well is evidence that many people feel that way.
Popular songs will be cheaper, obscure more expensive.
In fact the announcement said the exact opposite.
Wow... you people are acting like Apple is raising the price to $30 per song or something.
it's only 30 cents, and they're all now DRM-free.
Jeez, people.
And you forgot that people keep ignoring that on some tracks the price is going DOWN.
Many people can't afford music to begin with and are still gracious enough to buy it when they can EASILY pirate them, probably at higher quality too. Especially in this economy, 30 cents increase IS a lot if you buy a lot of music. If you can afford it easily, then kudos to you - but don't be such a b*** about it and try to think about other people! sorry for my language, but what kind of way is that to talk? i'm sorry but i couldn't find another word, if mods see this post and are unhappy (idk if it's against the rules) then feel free to edit that word out
In the meanwhile, I'll be downloading off of Amazon for cheaper, and "on the fly" as well..🙄
I'm fine with the prices with iTunes, it's up to you if you want to buy the music from there or not, there are plenty of other places that you can find it cheaper for, but why have such an attitude?
Good.. they removed something that shouldn't have been there in the first place - now people are left to pay for it?🙄
Perfect example. Did you miss the part where they said some prices are staying the same and some are going DOWN?
I wonder if the whiners will come crawling back to iTunes when the track they want is 69 cents and cheaper than amazon (which still has tons of stuff at 99)?