However blu-ray's are great when buying second hand, if you don't mind the physical room they take up when the collecton gets big (this is a two sided debate because i'm rappidly running out of hard drive space due to the amount of HD movies I have in iTunes lol).
Actually quite impressed with the sound and video quality on iTunes.
Sound wise, it's not Loessless Mutli-Channel like blu-ray, but high bitrate AAC isn't exactly poor quality, especially when listening from the built in TV speakers.
Video wise, i've done some extensive tests and found iTunes to be at least on par with blu-ray and actually sometimes better, this might be a h.254 High vs H.264 Main discussion or poor H.264 decoder on cheaper/earlier blu-ray players. Eitherwise the Apple TV seems to have a very advanced H.264 decoder built in and get's all my movies off the internet, which is like a backup and great if my house burnt down!
Jonny
Some thoughts on the subject. I do not represent them as wholly original:
1. Physical media is dying. I can't imagine the movie studios/production companies are shedding any tears. I rarely buy movies, but I'm in the process of obtaining the Kubrick collection on Blu Ray as I'm concerned it will be removed from ownership at some point.
2. Support your local record store. They often sell used media (including Blu Rays) for pennies on the dollar. These guys are being squeezed out of the market, and deserve all the support you can offer.
3. iTunes. I need to reread the Service Agreement. I'm not sure whether you buy the movie or buy a licence. Also, can the licence expire?
4. I think we're in the halcyon days of paid streaming. I think it's just a matter of time until Production companies work out a way to charge you for media by view. I know the current Time Warner versus CBS/Showtime hullabaloo demonstrates how companies are fighting harder and harder for ways to increase revenue. I cannot predict how it will work out beyond me having to pay more.
Hi everyone,
I'm looking to begin a collection of my favourite movies, but am torn between digital (iTunes) vs physical (Blu Ray). iTunes is nice because it works on all of our Apple stuff, whereas the Blu ray only works on the TV/Blu Ray player. But at the same time, it's nice having physical copies as a backup or to lend, etc. If I wanted to bring movies with me (e.g. to travel), I'd have to rip the movie into a playable format and copy it to the iPad/iPhone, or get an external Blu Ray drive and bring it with me for the MacBook.
What's the better investment you think?
Sorry, just stubled upon this, but i can't beleive you think itunes compares to Blu-Ray. Itunes isn't close to 1080p. On average Blu-Ray has 5X more data per second than iTunes "HD" versions. A slightly more efficient codec cannot make up for this.
Are you watching on a 720 monitor or TV?
Good arguments from both sides, but I'm a little confused by the people that mentioned they prefer physical media because they have a 'backup'. Isn't it kind of the opposite? If you have physical media and it breaks or gets scratched or whatever, that's the end of it, you'll need a new copy.
With iTunes and other digital media, you own that file and if all your devices end up stolen or burned or exploded or whatever, just log into iTunes and download it again. Or stream it to a portable device anywhere in the world you have internet connection.
Physical media is dying, I think it's a poor time to invest in that.
- You don't really own the file in iTunes. Sometimes iTunes download can be spotty.
- Even worse, Apple could just pull some movies off the store due to copyright or other reasons. It happened and usually no refund is available. In that case. Boom.
- Not all places have a speedy internet to accommodate movie download, let alone streaming. You need at least 5 Mbps or more to conveniently stream HD movies. You might travel to places with 512Kbps connection and you woul barely be able to do anything.
- iTunes movies are expensive considering you need to download it by yourself. Most blurays get you a superior quality + digital copy for same dollars, or even less.
- Even worse, Apple could just pull some movies off the store due to copyright or other reasons. It happened and usually no refund is available. In that case. Boom.
I'd be on the iTunes bandwagon if the prices were slight cheaper. I mean $5.99 to RENT a movie? I can purchase it second hand on Blu Ray w/ a digital copy for a couple dollars more.
I think renting a movie should be $1-1.50 similar with Redbox. I would definitely take advantage of that.
I agree with you there! I was spoiled by HD DVD, which booted up and played significantly faster than Blu-ray. I was shocked when I got my first Blu-ray and got a screen saying that it could take 2-3 minutes to start up!![]()
I am unsure why people are so gung ho on iTunes other than ease of acquiring a file to own or rent.
.
I mean $5.99 to RENT a movie? .
Blu-Ray for me. Better image quality and is often a lot cheaper if it is not a new release. Plus they increasingly come with digital copies, so you get both for one price. And I am more likely to take a risk on a film I don't know, because I can often sell it for a good price if I don't like it.
i started buying thru Itunes .. just less hassle and I dont need more clutter from physical media
Sorry, just stubled upon this, but i can't beleive you think itunes compares to Blu-Ray. Itunes isn't close to 1080p. On average Blu-Ray has 5X more data per second than iTunes "HD" versions. A slightly more efficient codec cannot make up for this.
Are you watching on a 720 monitor or TV?